1. Were tested
2. Stayed in the same
3. Switched to a different
Answer:
2. He’s the man who single-handedly transformed a common epithet for a criminal into a source of masculine strength.
After recording two albums – the muddled 2Pacalypse Now and the slightly improved Strictly 4 My . – Shakur unveiled his crew L.I.F.E., an acronym for The Hate U Gave Little Infants Everybody. At the time, it seemed like an unnecessary variation on the “gangster” trope that dominated West Coast rap at the time. However, his reimagining of a word that the Oxford Dictionary defines as “a violent person, especially a criminal” into an positive attribute resonated. 2Pac’s vision redefined the word “thug” into a man who triumphs over systemic and societal obstacles. By the end of 1994, Cleveland quintet B.O.N.E. Enterprises had renamed themselves Bone Thugs-N-Harmony; the word has been since been adopted by Young , Slim and too many others to mention.
THE ANSWER IS C : <span>MacGregor believes the antique tea set to be a symbol ... ect.
</span>
I can help you with a rough draft; but unfortunately i don’t have access to either of the stories so i cant cite evidence. i’m assuming you can fill in some quotes to help support?
Call of the Wild is a story (based on what i word all have read) that has a lot to do with nature (?) and survival. This ties in with Darwin’s theory of natural selection since it also has to do with evolution of nature and survival and adaptation. (assuming that Call of the Wild also requires adaptation, considering most survival stories do), Call of the Wild relates a lot in how people evolve when being put in risky situations & an outdoor environment.
Answer:
- Surveys.
Explanation:
Surveys are described as the research method in which a predefined group is examined, assessed, or evaluated to gather information or insights about concerns or aspects associated with a topic. The potential problem with such a study method is that 'the respondents tend to answer questions in a manner that would look good or what the majority feels instead of communicating their true opinions or feelings about the issue.' Peterson and others(2011) revealed that it indirectly causes a flaw or bias in the conclusion and affects its credibility.
