Answer:
I believe the answer is C
Explanation:
Fictional characters are easy to control and lets the writer have creative freedom. Details about characters are often pulled from real life people in order to make them more relatable and come to life, hope this helped!
Answer:
Through the use of formal language and informal dialogue, Zora Neale Hurston was able to convey her own cultural experiences.
Explanation: Zora Neale Hurston, a famous writer during the Harlem Renaissance wrote her famous "Their Eyes were Watching God". It narrates the story of a black woman in Harlem that depicts issues of race and gender issues prevalent in those times through it's main character Janie Crawford. After two failed marriages, she fell in love with a much younger man, Tea Cake. Though she had married for love, she is reluctant to publicly accept him as her husband because of the social pressure and the opinion of the people and what they may say. Throughout the story, we find the various characters talking in formal and informal language, contrasting between the two. And it is through this pattern that the author Hurston is able to successfully convey her own cultural experiences within the novel.
The poet described about the kill of the Element is given below.
Explanation:
In the 1920s a young would-be poet, an ex-Etonian named Eric Blair, arrived as a Burma Police recruit and was posted to several places, culminating in Moulmein. Here he was accused of killing a timber company elephant, the chief of police saying he was a disgrace to Eton. Blair resigned while back in England on leave, and published several books under his assumed name, George Orwell.
In 1936 these were followed by what he called a “sketch” describing how, and more importantly why, he had killed a runaway elephant during his time in Moulmein, today known as Mawlamyine. By this time Orwell was highly regarded, and many were reluctant to accept that he had indeed killed an elephant. Six years later, however, a cashiered Burma Police captain named Herbert Robinson published a memoir in which he reported young Eric Blair (whom he called “the poet”) as saying back in the 1920s that he wanted to kill an elephant.
All the same, doubt has persisted among Orwell’s biographers. Neither Bernard Crick nor DJ Taylor believe he killed an elephant, Crick suggesting that he was merely influenced by a fashionable genre that blurred the line between fiction and autobiography.
To me, Orwell’s description of the great creature’s heartbreakingly slow death suggests an acute awareness of wrongdoing, as do his repeated protests: “I had no intention of shooting the elephant… I did not in the least want to shoot him … I did not want to shoot the elephant.” Though Orwell shifts the blame on to the imperialist system, I think the poet did shoot the elephant. But read the sketch and decide for yourself.
she did not cause him to recoil from her
Answer:
In 1879 a group of American citizens came together to to accomplish a dream of bringing art and education to the Americans by making a museum. In the group there were businessmen, financers. leading artists and leading thinkers. On this very day in 1870, it was accomplished and named The Metropolitan Museum of Art. After a short span of time, they even showcased their first piece of artwork, a Roman sarcophagus.
Explanation:
