1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
patriot [66]
3 years ago
11

Compare and contrast the views of loyalists and patriots on American independence from Great Britain. 3 paragraphs please I have

no clue
History
2 answers:
Alex73 [517]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Loyalist and Patriot views compare and contrast in many ways as their views on reconciliation, independent states, and the King of Great Britain differed. Loyalists were people who stayed loyal to the King during the 1700s whereas patriots were people who wanted independence from the King. These two view points differed in many events and were shared in speeches throughout the 1700s.

    Reconciliation was a huge topic during the 1700s as loyalist believed that was the greatest option. For example William Smith, in document 6, expressed that reconciliation is better than trying to gain independence as it was in both countries mutual interests and safety. He explained that independence will further damage Great Britain and the colonies relationship and it would make the colonies life harder. In document 7, Charles Inglis made it clear that reconciliation would restore peace and the colonies could go back to their normal lives. However the patriots, such as the majority of the colony in Malden, Massachusetts, in document 1, believed that Great Britain did many wrong doings which could not be made up through peace.

   The arguement of whether the colonies should be indepenent states was highly debated between the loyalists and the patriots. In document 4, loyalist Samuel Seabury shared that the colonies, if they became independent states, would dispute about many things causing them to go to war against each other. As he explained, it would “turn our arms on one another;—province against province,—and destruction and carnage would dessolate the land.” without a stable monarchy. Furthermore, patriots such as Thomas Paine, in document 5, wrote Common Sense to explain that staying connected to Great Britain would cause trade ruin in the colonies if Great Britain ever went to war with another country.

    The view of the King of Great Britain can also be compared between the loyalist and the patriots as both sides thought differently on his influence within the colonies. In Document 3, John Dickinson shared that liberty under the English Monarchy was still enjoyable while England also supplied us with support in military arms and the pride of their name. He stated that the King would tear them apart due to him being so powerful. Whereas the patriots, expressed in document 1, believed that independence from the King would bring them closer to a well established country and they would not serve under any King any longer. Furthermore, patriot beliefs also included those that thought the King was being greedy and had ruined trade for the colonies with other countries many times.

    In conclusion, loyalist and patriots expressed different views on reconciliation, independent states, and the King of Great Britain. Loyalist views were usually loyal to the King and supported Great Britian’s ideals. Whereas, patriot views were usually regarded to independence for the colonies and to be free from royal rule.

Explanation:

hope this helps :)

crimeas [40]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

picture? i think u need a picture of it

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What did African American do for the first time during Reconstruction?​
Svetllana [295]

Answer:

Had/Gained a voice in Government decisions

Explanation:

I'm not 100% sure this is the exact answer but its the best i can remember.

8 0
3 years ago
When did the battle of goliad take place
Ludmilka [50]

Answer:

October 9, 1835

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What date would be 6 months 3 days away from april 16 pls pls i need u to help me
dimulka [17.4K]

Sunday, October 16, 2022

7 0
2 years ago
How are interest groups different from political parties?
iren [92.7K]
Political groups are groups which mostly look up on politics while interest are groups which are eager to know more about something
7 0
2 years ago
Which action is most similar to one taken by germany after world war 1
azamat

Answer:

A country prints huge quantities of money to pay off debts to its neighbors.

Explanation:

Germany was put into tons of debt by the Treaty of Versailles so any country would logically do this to pay off debts.

<h2>What happened in Germany after World War 1?</h2>

The First World War significantly altered how people in Germany lived their lives at home.

During the First World War, Germany enlisted a large number of men, and as more were called up each year, the nation ran out of male labor.

Food shortages occurred throughout Germany as a result of a decrease in food importation, which was partially caused by Allied Forces blockades. Many houses lost a husband or father as a result of the significant military casualties. How did German society respond to such abrupt changes, then?

Employers struggled to replace the roles of millions of men due to widespread conscription and subsequent call-ups year after year. The remaining citizens of Germany's home front were given employment, and they turned to two social groups—youths and women—each of which had a unique perspective on the workplace.

Many women and families were left to adjust to home life as they had never known it while the millions of men who made up the German army were engaged in combat.

Families struggled to subsist on government handouts after a husband or parent passed away since they lost their source of income. In his book The First World War, Holger Herwig claims that by 1918, there were 2 million women—mostly widows—who were attempting to make ends meet on meager government pensions.

These women were the ones Germany looked to in order to make up for the labor deficit, stabilize work, and provide an income for families. Although it appears that these women contributed significantly to the German economy, working had several very substantial drawbacks.

Women began to experience treatment that made them feel less valuable than the males they worked with and the combatants. Many employers made it quite apparent that once the war was over, their positions would no longer be secure and would once again be accessible to the soldiers who had left them behind.

The Second World War was the catalyst for a change in mindset. Female identity began to be acknowledged in the job rather than being closely linked to the home and being in charge of raising children and taking care of household duties.

However, women found it challenging to blend in as a member of a working team during the First World War. In addition, they struggled with low pay, with many finding it difficult to provide for their families.

Many women were paid just 50 percent of what their male counterparts did. They were also obliged to put in long hours of labor, which left them with little money for essentials and even less time to spend with their kids.

Young people also saw a shift in circumstances, but in a very different way than how women did, as society underwent changes.

Youths spent less time with their families and, in some circumstances, were required to provide for the home since moms were compelled to work and dads were in the military.

Young people began dropping out of school early because many teachers were drafted into the military, and schools sometimes lacked the resources necessary for students to continue their education.

Youths began to feel a different kind of freedom when they stopped depending on their family and schools. As they began to enjoy their first taste of financial independence, they started working at weapons factories to replace those who had been called to active duty.

Herwig claims that between 1914 and 18 there was an increase in young employment of 225% in the chemical sector, 97% in steel, and 59% in machines. The young individuals working in these positions were responsible for providing the German troops with crucial wartime supplies. As a result, in Germany, women and young people supplemented the meager government-provided income for families to make up for the workforce shortfall.

There was another significant issue that had an influence on living at home when women and young people were adjusting to life in the workplace. Lack of food was a major issue in Germany, which also had an impact on health.

Due to a lack of food production and imports, Germany had to expand its agriculture in order to feed both a sizable army and civilian population.

Sorry! Brainly has a max limit of characters (letters, numbers, spaces, special symbols etc.) Hopefully this was enough to help grab a understanding!

Thank you,

Eddie

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How could africans resist the dehumanizing forces of the middle passage and seasoning and use their african cultures to build bl
    9·2 answers
  • ⦁ What countries had an influence on Japan?
    5·1 answer
  • Which advantage did the second location of San Juan Bautista Mission have over its first location
    7·2 answers
  • What were the three outstanding events in 1619 that had a great influence on the colonies?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following organizational structures in the League of Nations dealt
    5·1 answer
  • Please helppppppppp me
    10·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Effects of ethnic conflicts to the development of africa​
    5·1 answer
  • How did Michelangelo make his living?
    6·2 answers
  • Identify each characteristic or person as part of either german unification or italian unification.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!