1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
patriot [66]
2 years ago
11

Compare and contrast the views of loyalists and patriots on American independence from Great Britain. 3 paragraphs please I have

no clue
History
2 answers:
Alex73 [517]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Loyalist and Patriot views compare and contrast in many ways as their views on reconciliation, independent states, and the King of Great Britain differed. Loyalists were people who stayed loyal to the King during the 1700s whereas patriots were people who wanted independence from the King. These two view points differed in many events and were shared in speeches throughout the 1700s.

    Reconciliation was a huge topic during the 1700s as loyalist believed that was the greatest option. For example William Smith, in document 6, expressed that reconciliation is better than trying to gain independence as it was in both countries mutual interests and safety. He explained that independence will further damage Great Britain and the colonies relationship and it would make the colonies life harder. In document 7, Charles Inglis made it clear that reconciliation would restore peace and the colonies could go back to their normal lives. However the patriots, such as the majority of the colony in Malden, Massachusetts, in document 1, believed that Great Britain did many wrong doings which could not be made up through peace.

   The arguement of whether the colonies should be indepenent states was highly debated between the loyalists and the patriots. In document 4, loyalist Samuel Seabury shared that the colonies, if they became independent states, would dispute about many things causing them to go to war against each other. As he explained, it would “turn our arms on one another;—province against province,—and destruction and carnage would dessolate the land.” without a stable monarchy. Furthermore, patriots such as Thomas Paine, in document 5, wrote Common Sense to explain that staying connected to Great Britain would cause trade ruin in the colonies if Great Britain ever went to war with another country.

    The view of the King of Great Britain can also be compared between the loyalist and the patriots as both sides thought differently on his influence within the colonies. In Document 3, John Dickinson shared that liberty under the English Monarchy was still enjoyable while England also supplied us with support in military arms and the pride of their name. He stated that the King would tear them apart due to him being so powerful. Whereas the patriots, expressed in document 1, believed that independence from the King would bring them closer to a well established country and they would not serve under any King any longer. Furthermore, patriot beliefs also included those that thought the King was being greedy and had ruined trade for the colonies with other countries many times.

    In conclusion, loyalist and patriots expressed different views on reconciliation, independent states, and the King of Great Britain. Loyalist views were usually loyal to the King and supported Great Britian’s ideals. Whereas, patriot views were usually regarded to independence for the colonies and to be free from royal rule.

Explanation:

hope this helps :)

crimeas [40]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

picture? i think u need a picture of it

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Anglo-Saxon continued to be spoken by _____.<br><br> the common people<br> invaders in the country
xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:

the common people

Explanation:

hope this help homie B)

6 0
3 years ago
Discuss Cold War tensions and events during the presidency of John F. Kennedy
svet-max [94.6K]

Answer:

During the cold war tensions between the USA and Soviet Union were as tense as could be but with no real action going on, the Cold War was more of a stale mate of one side waiting for the other to do something.

Explanation:

Both sides did not want war but both expected each other to have weapons of mass destruction.

7 0
3 years ago
What happened in America factories during World War 2
emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

Explanation:

This is one of the most interesting questions you could ask about WW2. I'm going to become a little yakky about this question because it is so important.

In the beginning of the war, before Pearl Harbor, America was asleep. She tried to arm both Britain and Russia but the problem was German subs. They destroyed an awful lot of need materials (including weapons). The American public ignored this so Roosevelt's hands were tied.

On the Japanese side, only Admiral Yamamoto opposed waking America up but since the rest of the Admiralty was all for attacking the US, it was Yamamoto who decided that if they were going to do something foolish, then it better Cripple the US for a long time, or at least long enough to find a good supply of Oil.

Then Pearl Harbor came and America woke up. It was decided that with what they knew, America would engage Hitler first.

That turned out to be impossible, so the factories went into production and Rosie the riveter/welder came into being. I think it was 20% of the work force were women and they did learn how to weld and use a riveter.

By the end of the war, America produced enough tonnage  of munitions and ships and planes to fight on both fronts. (The Pacific was made up of 3 fronts, and America supplied them all plus Europe).   America simply over whelmed her enemies. It is an amazing story, well worth your while to go deeper. Your grandparents and great grandparents will be able to tell you quite a bit if they served or worked in factories.

6 0
2 years ago
Stating that nothing must interfere with the ability of Americans "to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the fr
Nikolay [14]

Answer:

The answer is: <u><em>manifest destiny</em></u>

Explanation:

John L. O’Sullivan, Who worked as an editor of a magazine was the first one to use “manifest destiny” in 1845.

This concept stated that America has a right to expand across the whole continent so that they can become more powerful and independent.

6 0
2 years ago
The Jazz Age, also known as the "The Roaring Twenties" took place in the Great Gatsby during the 1920s. It was a period after Wo
Serjik [45]

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

Young women's attire drastically changed in a way that was often frowned upon by the elders. Women went to night clubs, wore make-up and fancy dresses, and shortened their hair. These were all uncommon things which led to accusations against their morals.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best summarizes John of Leyden's attitude towards reforms needed in the Catholic Church?
    9·1 answer
  • Ancient Egypt Chin's conduct a land surveying and built monumental pyramids what did later civilizations inherit from their inno
    11·1 answer
  • Auppose ou have the job of assigning the proper number of house of representatives seats of various states to do that you must k
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the office of Vice President become more important with more responsibilities as the 20th century progressed
    8·2 answers
  • What did they create? What powers did the new government have? List some of them
    5·2 answers
  • What country finally gained control of most of America?
    6·2 answers
  • True or False: German General Rommel led Nazi troops were initially successful against the Allies
    5·1 answer
  • (PLEASE HELP)
    9·1 answer
  • HEY YOU! Stop scrolling. Im the one you want to help!!!! PLEASEEE!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Please help me
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!