1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Agata [3.3K]
2 years ago
7

Why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into Poland? Why were the tracks leading to Birkenau never bombed? I have put t

hese questions to American presidents and generals and to high-ranking Soviet officers. Since Moscow and Washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their "production"? That not a single Allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on Auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. Birkenau was "processing" ten thousand Jews a day. Stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives.
History
2 answers:
kolbaska11 [484]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice.

Explanation:

Just got it correct on Edge

:) please vote brainliest

anyanavicka [17]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Historically, the primary reason the lines leading to Birkenau were never attacked was due to a lack of political resolve to do so, and not because bombing operations were unimportant. When the gas chambers were operational in 1941, the majority of the concentration camps were located out from the range of Allied bombers and German air defenses.

The Allied Forces knew about the detention camps by June 1944, and the German air defenses were on the decline. Bomber efficiency is improving. The railroads were still intact. Every day, thousands of Jewish are processed in these centers.

Historians agree that the Nazis would still murder the Jews even without the concentration camps. The mobile death squads were among the most prolific extermination organizations of the Nazis. Even though the bombs wouldn't halt the murders, the Allied focused on the bombings of military camps and industrial areas in order to undermine Germany's war operations.

Explanation:

Railways were an important component of the Holocaust and Nazi activities. Information on the camps was only accessible after the war had ended. They felt that the costs would exceed the advantages of bombing the railroads. Millions of Jews had already been gassed.

Had the Allied Forces simply bombed the railroads once they had the intelligence, many lives might have been spared. They only needed political will and a commitment to social duty, regardless of the personal dangers, in order to put a stop to the camps' deadly activities.

Soviet forces were the major Allied soldiers in the Eastern Front, where they committed genocide of their own people. Stalin also has anti-Semitic inclinations. We may be certain that he didn't bomb the railroads and let the Germans continue to use the extermination camps.

Hope this helps, if so would you mind saying thanks?

You might be interested in
Question 35
Kitty [74]

Answer:

ethnic and religious tension one

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The erie canal allowed for the transportation of goods from
aivan3 [116]
<span>The Erie Canal allwed for the American Midwest to transport their good via waterway to the port in New York City and then out to the world for consumption via trade. The Erie Canal was the largest civic project the United States built up to that point in time and made settling the midwest much more economical.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
How did railroads help the growth of standard oil
ch4aika [34]

In turn, the railroads had a great impact on the steel industry. ... The rapid rise of the steel and railroad industries between the end of the Civil War and the early 1900s spurred the growth of other big businesses, especially in the oil, financial, and manufacturing sectors of the economy.

HOPE THIS HELPED!!!

3 0
3 years ago
Reread this excerpt from Common Sense. What does Paine say the king’s job is? To fight wars and give away land To worship his pe
Dafna11 [192]

Answer:

¨In England a King hath little more to do than to make war and give away places; which, in plain terms, is to [impoverish] the nation and set it together by the ears. A pretty business indeed for a man to be allowed eight hundred thousand sterling a year for, and worshipped into the bargain! Of more worth is one honest man to society, and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived.¨  By reading this passage you can infer the answer is: To fight wars and give away land

Explanation: Mark brainliest?

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
25 POINTS!!!!!!!
JulijaS [17]
Julius<span> and </span>Ethel Rosenberg were<span> United States citizens who spied for the Soviet Union and </span>were<span> tried, convicted, and executed for conspiracy to commit espionage.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • One of the Patriots' greatest strengths was their
    13·2 answers
  • Why was germany willing to accept hitler as a dictator and to use the jews as scapegoats?
    7·1 answer
  • The first continental congress did not pass what resolution?
    10·2 answers
  • What can be used in the Senate to stop a bill from being passed
    7·1 answer
  • When Samuel Johnson coined the term"metaphysical poets," what trait was he calling attention to?​
    12·1 answer
  • What does Paul list as the core components of a church service? Why are these important and central?
    15·1 answer
  • This Russian scientist headed up the Soviet space program for many years
    9·1 answer
  • This is due in less than an hour can someone help us please
    8·1 answer
  • What do you think Patriotism means in America today?
    14·1 answer
  • In both Japan and China,
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!