1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Agata [3.3K]
2 years ago
7

Why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into Poland? Why were the tracks leading to Birkenau never bombed? I have put t

hese questions to American presidents and generals and to high-ranking Soviet officers. Since Moscow and Washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their "production"? That not a single Allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on Auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. Birkenau was "processing" ten thousand Jews a day. Stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives.
History
2 answers:
kolbaska11 [484]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice.

Explanation:

Just got it correct on Edge

:) please vote brainliest

anyanavicka [17]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Historically, the primary reason the lines leading to Birkenau were never attacked was due to a lack of political resolve to do so, and not because bombing operations were unimportant. When the gas chambers were operational in 1941, the majority of the concentration camps were located out from the range of Allied bombers and German air defenses.

The Allied Forces knew about the detention camps by June 1944, and the German air defenses were on the decline. Bomber efficiency is improving. The railroads were still intact. Every day, thousands of Jewish are processed in these centers.

Historians agree that the Nazis would still murder the Jews even without the concentration camps. The mobile death squads were among the most prolific extermination organizations of the Nazis. Even though the bombs wouldn't halt the murders, the Allied focused on the bombings of military camps and industrial areas in order to undermine Germany's war operations.

Explanation:

Railways were an important component of the Holocaust and Nazi activities. Information on the camps was only accessible after the war had ended. They felt that the costs would exceed the advantages of bombing the railroads. Millions of Jews had already been gassed.

Had the Allied Forces simply bombed the railroads once they had the intelligence, many lives might have been spared. They only needed political will and a commitment to social duty, regardless of the personal dangers, in order to put a stop to the camps' deadly activities.

Soviet forces were the major Allied soldiers in the Eastern Front, where they committed genocide of their own people. Stalin also has anti-Semitic inclinations. We may be certain that he didn't bomb the railroads and let the Germans continue to use the extermination camps.

Hope this helps, if so would you mind saying thanks?

You might be interested in
The ideas of enlightenment philosophers were based on?
Darya [45]
They where based on human reason, they believed that humans had wisdom.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The practice by republicans of reminding voters who caused the civil war was known as
LenaWriter [7]
The practice by Republicans of reminding voters who caused the civil war was known as waving of the bloody shirt.

It is the political strategy of engaging with voters by reminding the passion and privation of the civil war. It focuses on reconstruction issues facing the country.  It is also called the practicing the unpleasant memory from the past. 
5 0
4 years ago
Negative feedback is most like
Llana [10]

Answer:

we definitely need some positive vibes

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Wat is " An Elephant's excellent trunk"mostly about?
Leokris [45]
It is a metaphor, meaning you are spectuacular. (from usa at least)
6 0
3 years ago
In what kind of government Does a small group have firm control over it's country?
Mandarinka [93]
That would be in an o<span>ligarchy. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés wrote the following excerpt in a letter to the Spanish king:
    9·1 answer
  • Why was the new king of Egypt afraid of the israelites?
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement describes a cause of the Cuban Missile Crisis?. . . . A.. The United States and Cuba traded missiles to threaten
    9·2 answers
  • What swept through the roman empire, killing 10 percent of the population in the third century AD?
    9·1 answer
  • Article 2 of the Texas Constitution states: "... Those which are Legislative to one;
    5·1 answer
  • The first woman to serve in the U.S. congress was?
    7·2 answers
  • Where did friars live​
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following was not rationed during world war 2
    6·1 answer
  • What was a result of the growing number of consumer goods in 1920s
    13·1 answer
  • Hello everyone in what country did you come from?​
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!