1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Agata [3.3K]
2 years ago
7

Why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into Poland? Why were the tracks leading to Birkenau never bombed? I have put t

hese questions to American presidents and generals and to high-ranking Soviet officers. Since Moscow and Washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their "production"? That not a single Allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on Auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. Birkenau was "processing" ten thousand Jews a day. Stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives.
History
2 answers:
kolbaska11 [484]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice.

Explanation:

Just got it correct on Edge

:) please vote brainliest

anyanavicka [17]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Historically, the primary reason the lines leading to Birkenau were never attacked was due to a lack of political resolve to do so, and not because bombing operations were unimportant. When the gas chambers were operational in 1941, the majority of the concentration camps were located out from the range of Allied bombers and German air defenses.

The Allied Forces knew about the detention camps by June 1944, and the German air defenses were on the decline. Bomber efficiency is improving. The railroads were still intact. Every day, thousands of Jewish are processed in these centers.

Historians agree that the Nazis would still murder the Jews even without the concentration camps. The mobile death squads were among the most prolific extermination organizations of the Nazis. Even though the bombs wouldn't halt the murders, the Allied focused on the bombings of military camps and industrial areas in order to undermine Germany's war operations.

Explanation:

Railways were an important component of the Holocaust and Nazi activities. Information on the camps was only accessible after the war had ended. They felt that the costs would exceed the advantages of bombing the railroads. Millions of Jews had already been gassed.

Had the Allied Forces simply bombed the railroads once they had the intelligence, many lives might have been spared. They only needed political will and a commitment to social duty, regardless of the personal dangers, in order to put a stop to the camps' deadly activities.

Soviet forces were the major Allied soldiers in the Eastern Front, where they committed genocide of their own people. Stalin also has anti-Semitic inclinations. We may be certain that he didn't bomb the railroads and let the Germans continue to use the extermination camps.

Hope this helps, if so would you mind saying thanks?

You might be interested in
The President can veto any laws that Congress makes, but Congress can override the veto with a 2/3 vote or the judicial branch c
Aneli [31]
Did you get the answer
6 0
3 years ago
In 1863, Lincoln passed a law that freed slaves still open rebellion against the union. What was this law called?
Soloha48 [4]
Emancipation proclamation
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was Russia first parliament
evablogger [386]
Duma
The State Duma<span> was created in a wave of violent attacks against imperial officials and public upheaval, which culminated in a national strike in October 1905 known as Russian Revolution of 1905, paving the way for Russia's first parliament.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
25 points! PLEASE HELP!! I WILL MARK BRAINLYEST!What was the impact of the Dixiecrats on the democratic party in the south pleas
blondinia [14]
I don’t know if this helps but I found a Wikipedia page with lots of useful information. Sorry I couldn’t give a straight up answer but I haven’t gone over this in class.

4 0
3 years ago
How do the Congo and Algeria differ when it comes to political instability? Congo failed to create a democracy, while Algeria de
VMariaS [17]

Answer:

Congo provinces seceded, while Algerians remained loyal to their country.

Explanation:

In Congo, more power is present with the regional leaders of the provinces as compared to central government which is the main cause of political instability in the country whereas in Algeria, the power of all provinces are in the hands of central government. All the leaders of provinces are loyal to the government and their country and that's the reason that Algeria is politically more stable than Congo.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did US and coalition troops try to stop Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait?
    14·2 answers
  • Why did the north abolish slavery
    12·2 answers
  • What power does the president exercise when making treaties with other countries
    15·1 answer
  • Which was not a result of the growth of railroads in the 1800s? A. Raw materials could be shipped to factories year round. B. In
    15·2 answers
  • Which items do historians study to learn about the past
    7·1 answer
  • Since there are a total of 435
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of ethnic enclave?
    10·2 answers
  • Which best describes deforestation?
    12·1 answer
  • I need a full Marcus and Narcissa Whitman Timeline please and thank you &lt;3
    7·1 answer
  • As the allies close in on the germans, concentration camps are evacuated and prisoners are forced to go on death marches by ss o
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!