1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sliva [168]
3 years ago
10

What was the political state of Southeast Asia at the start of World War I ?​

History
1 answer:
DENIUS [597]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The political state of Southeast Asia

Explanation:

Southeast Asia was left unharmed by the war, the echoes of the conflict felt in the region for decades. There was no invasion of the region by a hostile power in World War I. The task of Southeast Asia was to provide goods in Europe for the armies fighting in the war. Southeast Asia was part of the colonial. France and Britain had colonies in Southeast Asia. The Central Powers including, Germany and Austria-Hungary had no colonial territory in the region.

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP ITS URGENT!!!!
UkoKoshka [18]
C permanent latin christian kingdoms in the middle east hope this helps
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help its a test and ima give u the brainy thingy
MAXImum [283]

Answer:

Tributes

Explanation:

Trust me

5 0
3 years ago
Christian beliefs did the Jews strongly disagree with?
timurjin [86]
Jews believe that Jesus wasn't the messiah. Christians do.<span />
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are some positive and negative about living in the new england colony
sladkih [1.3K]

positive: a new land to be populated

negative: living under the orders of the metropolis England all the time.

6 0
3 years ago
Can you suggest a reason why historians see Marston Moor as a ‘turning point’ in the civil war?
leonid [27]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options for this question we can say the following.

Historians see Marston Moor as a ‘turning point’ in the civil war because this was the largest battle regarding the number of troops, to be fought in England during the English Civil War (1642-1651). Historians think that according to some sources, the Parliamentarian and Scots troops killed approximately 4,000 Royalists soldiers.

The victory of the Parliamentarian and Scots meant one thing but an important one in the Civil War: the Royalists had lost total control of the North part of the English territory.

Historians also consider that the victory impulsed the career of military official Oliver Cromwell.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Archaeologists' discovery of stone age family burials in europe was sociologically significant because
    10·1 answer
  • This timeline shows 20th century genocide.
    10·2 answers
  • How Did Magna Carta Influence the U.S. Constitution ?
    11·1 answer
  • In ancient China, many aspects of life were ruled by the___ of Confucius. 
    12·2 answers
  • What processes helped create the grand canyon
    11·2 answers
  • What was true of the Battle of Iwo Jima?
    9·2 answers
  • Someone who is good at history please help me ;-l
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    15·1 answer
  • What was General Grant’s strategy for winning the war?
    7·1 answer
  • Can anyone help me with this assignment that I’m struggling getting answers from it plz anyone
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!