The argument has often been used to diminish the scale of slavery, reducing it to a crime committed by a few Southern planters, one that did not touch the rest of the United States. Slavery, the argument goes, was an inefficient system, and the labor of the enslaved was considered less productive than that of a free worker being paid a wage.
This sharp contrast between America’s lofty ideals, on the one hand, and the seemingly permanent second-class status of the Negroes, on the other, put the onus on the nation’s political elite to choose the nobility of their civic creed over the comfort of longstanding social arrangements. Ultimately they did so. Viewed from a historic and cross-national perspective, the legal and political transformation of American race relations since World War II represents a remarkable achievement, powerfully.
According to European colonial officials, the abundant land they had "discovered" in the Americas was useless without sufficient labor to exploit it. Slavery systems of labor exploitation were preferred, but neither European nor Native American sources proved adequate to the task.
Learn more about shaping America here:-brainly.com/question/19552107
#SPJ9
By comparing South Carolina's royal government to the other colonies, it was established that "Unlike most colonies, South Carolina had a bicameral legislature."
- This is evident in the fact that South Carolina's royal government has two houses.
- There are His Majesty's Council and the House of Commons.
- His Majesty's Council has twelve members all selected by the British King.
- The House of Commons has members elected by the colonists members.
- To be eligible to vote and be voted for in South Carolina during this period requires certain traits to be met, including being a white male, and having some financial worth defined by the government law at the time.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option A. "Unlike most colonies, South Carolina had a bicameral legislature.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/13955762
It restricted food cooperations from adding illegal ingriediants* to thier food. Has it improved? Yes
Answer:What is the Shirer thesis?
Shirer's thesis: Germans didn't accept the Treaty of Versailles, although it was reasonable, nor did they accept their new government, the Weimar Republic. Germans bitterness towards the Treaty and their lack of support for the Weimar Republic caused Germany to be a “house divided” and facilitated the rise of Hitler.
Explanation:
I just learned about this I have notes for it and it is either jade and stone works, or all of the above I am fairly certain it's all of the above.
