Last one is the correct answer
These questions are about the article "Are Americans Still Puritan?"
Answer and Explanation:
1. This is an expository article. This can be seen through the author's attempt to provide evidence to readers based on scientific and confirmed analyzes, where he literally exposes the topic in question, explaining it impartially and informing the reader.
2. The central idea is to expose the certainty that some Puritans have that they still exist and are influential in America, being part of American society.
3. To justify this perception of the Puritans, Hudson shows how the Puritans justify that many cultural points and customs present in America today are based on Puritan habits.
4. To explain a specific idea about Puritans believing they are still influential today, Hutson shows that many ideas from influential Puritans like Martin Luther and John Calvin are currently being encouraged, to confirm this, he shows that research has already been done with students from two universities that prove that the concepts of these two men are still taken seriously within society. I do not fully agree with Hutson's view because the research he cites in the article only represents a very small part of the population, which is not enough to represent American society.
Answer:
Learning the king expected his statue to crumble
Explanation:
I believe from a king and his peoples view a respectable towering statue of the one who led them to great triumphs, now expected to collapse to the ground can be a good additional lesson. I try to imagine the situation, what would I do? What would I feel? Before I lay a city left to ruins, the wind picks up the soil from the once lively dwellings. The population nowhere in sight, the statue of the one looked up upon now hidden underneath the muck.
I believe it would be to convince the audience of a certain viewpoint.
Back then, these individuals had no rights and were treated like absolute trash, far less than human. These individuals would drop off their children in institutions that had disgusting living conditions (e.g.. Willowbrook Institution) or just leave them out on the streets to fend for themselves. However, in today's perspective, these individuals have more rights than they did back then. They are considered more human and now have a voice in their own affairs, sometimes the government is in charge of some of these individuals.
