<u>Whigs and Democrats for a new political party:</u>
- The Democrats and Whigs were uniformly adjusted during the 1830s and 1840s.
- The Whigs additionally supported a government while Democrats favored state government.
- Whigs represented defensive duties, national banking, and government help for inside upgrades.
- Bondage is the thing that at last split up the Whig party in light of the fact that most northern Whigs put stock in annulling subjugation, while most southern Whigs thought the inverse.
- The Democrats were bound to grasp settlers' and states rights. In the mid 1850s, the two-party framework started to deteriorate because of enormous remote migration.
- By 1856 the Whig party had fell and been supplanted by another sectional gathering, the Republicans. However, by the 1850s, the Whigs broke down.
The first one in A) organizing demonstrations to protest discrimination
is the correct answer as far as i can remember
Answer: Civil liberties are protections against government actions. For example, the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights guarantees citizens the right to practice whatever religion they please. Government, then, cannot interfere in an individual's freedom of worship. Amendment I gives the individual "liberty" from the actions of the government.
Civil rights, in contrast, refer to positive actions of government should take to create equal conditions for all Americans. The term "civil rights" is often associated with the protection of minority groups, such as African Americans, Hispanics, and women. The government counterbalances the "majority rule" tendency in a democracy that often finds minorities outvoted.
Explanation:
What is the difference between a liberty and a right? Both words appear in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. The distinction between the two has always been blurred, and today the concepts are often used interchangeably. However, they do refer to different kinds of guaranteed protections.
Answer:
renewed interest in classical antiquity and philospohy
Explanation:
radical changes in ideas about religion, politics, and science.
Answer:
The three arguments of Thomas Jefferson against the National Bank of the United States are:
- The National Bank would be all too powerful and prevent the development of state banks, hindering one of the pillars of federalism in the United States: the autonomous development of the states in all sectors except for foreign policy.
- The Constitution does not give any power for the Federal Government to create a National Bank, making such act, according to Jefferson, automatically unconstitutional.
- Finally, the National Bank would, according to Jefferson, mostly help wealthy landowners, stockholders, and businessmen, to the detriment of farmers, workers, and the common in people in general.
