Answer:
C. Used chemical weapons against his own people.
Explanation:
Just took the test!
Answer:
Embora ambas as ideologias negassem a importância do indivíduo, o fascismo italiano via o indivíduo como subserviente ao estado, enquanto o nazismo via o indivíduo, bem como o estado, como, em última instância, subserviente à raça. No entanto, a subserviência ao estado nazista também era uma exigência para a população.
Explanation:
Answer:
A new generation of builders is devising daring structures that celebrate natural materials, push for eco-consciousness — and argue for a more democratic future
Explanation:
UNTIL LESS THAN a century ago, the Ayoreo peoples of Paraguay lived nomadically in the Chaco, a hot, dry region of savannas and thorn forests covering nearly 200 million acres spread across western Paraguay, southeastern Bolivia, northern Argentina and a small fringe of southern Brazil, a region once known by the Spanish as the infierno verde, or “green hell.” The Ayoreo were resourceful in building their modest shelters: Depending on the materials available to them, they might construct a low dome of leaves over branches cut from quebracho (ax breaker) trees, dig the hot earth out from underneath until they reached the cooler subsoil, then mix that excavated dirt with cactus sap, spreading the resultant thick paste between the leaves of the roof above to waterproof it. Settled into the hollowed ground beneath the dome, the interiors were cool and dim, a reprieve from the forest’s hostility. “These shelters don’t get recognition for being ‘green’ or ‘eco-friendly,’” says the 50-year-old architect José Cubilla, who’s based in Asunción, Paraguay’s capital, a slow-paced riverside city built at the point where the Chaco in the west meets the iridescent meadows and forests that unfurl across the country’s east. “But this is what interests me: obvious things, obvious solutions, simple materials.”
The British were, by and large, a dominating force. The American Colonies occupied land that the British would’ve claimed as their own. Infuriated, the British would vehemently disagree with the claim of American Colonials being treated unfairly. Throughout history, the British have experienced many successes and failures. Many times, they discover land only to lose it to another country. For example, the laborious endeavors the British had gone through to conquer India had come to waste when India decided to declare independence. Similarly, the American colonials split from the British. So no, I do not think the British thought the mistreatment towards the colonials was in any way unfair.
