Chief Justice John Marshall stated last 1803 in the case of Marbury v. Madison that "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each."
It implies that the judicial department applies the law and the understanding and interpretation therein would still be based on the designated person. If soever, the interpreter or representative in the judicial department would make any conflict with the intent, process, actual application of the law (the two representation of law), the courts would be the end to finalize the decision.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because people learn a lot through film, and inaccurate depictions are harmful.
Andrew Jackson<span> was a controversial and complicated president. This lesson will teach </span>you<span> all about the life of 'Ol Hickory, using </span>quotations<span> from... ... '</span>One man with courage makes a majority<span>.' ... </span>Jackson<span>eventually made </span>his<span> way to Nashville, Tennessee where he married into a ..... How to </span>Write<span> a Good Essay on Your AP.</span>
Answer:
The ancient Egyptian royal families were almost expected to marry within the family, as inbreeding was present in virtually every dynasty. ... It is believed that the pharaohs did this because of the ancient belief that the god Osiris married his sister Isis to keep their bloodline pure.
The French army was well disciplined, and was one of the largest in Europe
