Answer;
The three are;
1.justices is plainly giving back what is deserved.
<span>2. justices is interest of "strong,, governing parties". </span>
<span>3. "it is social necessity weak, but not valuable once one becomes strong."
</span>
Explanation;
<span>According to Plato, justice does not depend upon a chance, convention or upon external force. It is the right condition of the human soul by the very nature of man when seen in the fullness of his environment.He criticized strongly the conventional ideas of Justice presented differently by Cephalus, Polymarchus, Thrasymachus and Glaucon, and gave his own theory of justice.
</span>
Answer:
A. Roman empire split into two.
Explanation:
Why would splitting money, troops, etc not be bad.
This is what each place had:
Africa——-> enslaved people (slave trade)
The Carribean Islands——-> Sugar (they have lots of sugar cane in places like jamaica)
American colonies——> Indigo ( it’s a plant that has very pigmented color grew in the American south, used to dye clothes and stuff like that)
hope this helped! :)
Democrats were mostly Southern farmers and laborers. Those that moved to the west or labored in the west found it harder to get jobs because of Chinese laborers who would work for a lower wage. The North were more industrialized so they didn’t have to worry as much about losing their jobs to Chinese laborers. Also, during this time, Southern Democrats were still more openly racist than Northern Republicans, so pure racism may have played a role as well. The key here is to point out that the evidence was made by Democrats, so Americans passed the Exclusion Act mostly by Democratic concerns and beliefs.
I believe the answer to your question would be A. Western European Capitalistic Country, Hope this helps a bunch :)