Bite - nip and rapid -fast are synonyms while the rest are antonyms. Bite and nip are synonyms because it is the same action described differently. The same is for rapid and fast. Being innocent means to not have done anything but being guilty is having done something. For example, two people are in a court and the judge is deciding who the criminal is, the person who did nothing wrong is innocent and the person who committed the crime is guilty. Insult and compliment are antonyms because they mean two different things. An insult is rude while a compliment is kind. Pass and fail is pretty obvious as well as permanent and temporary. They are opposites of each other, therefore are antonyms.
The non-syncopation Spanish-derived rhythmic feature is prominent in Chilean folkloric genres such as Canada and cueca.
She has a sharp chin and nose. New books are displayed prominently on tables at the front of the store. Something that is in a prominent position is something that is easily seen or noticed. In general, the term "rhythm" refers to a movement that is "marked by the controlled succession of strong and weak elements, or of opposite or different conditions." Music's timing pattern is known as rhythm. No matter what other components a piece of music may contain (such as variations in pitch or timbre), rhythm is the only essential component. While melody cannot exist without rhythm, rhythm can, as in the drumbeats of so-called primitive music.
Learn more about rhythmic here :
brainly.com/question/22678004
#SPJ4
<span>There are disadvantages are there if the music is represented in graphical notation. Music, however, is sound itself and any notation is simply a form of attempting to represent the sounds of that music in graphic form. Any notation form, therefore, will never be more than an approximation. Your job is to work out which elements you which to compromise, and who is your intended reader.</span>
Answer:
Graduation Ceremony from what i understand you are asking sorry if i am wrong
Explanation:
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The given statement would be characterized as true as it correctly asserts that 'the law inflicts strict liability as a part of their public policy which assumes that in case of any kind of harm is caused to the consumers by the product, it's costs would be born by the manufacturer.' This liability of the manufacturer is categorized as 'product liability' which enforces the law that considers the 'manufacturer is responsible for any kind of damage or harm caused by their product.' Therefore, the statement is true.
