Answer:
you need to describe more... then I will answer
Answer:
This case has similarities to the instances of Cesarini v. the US, 296 F.Supp. 3 (N.D. Ohio 1969), is a noteworthy case decided by the U.S. Locale Court for the Northern District of Ohio, where the court decided that treasure trove property is remembered for net salary for the assessment year when it was found.
A. TAX RESEARCH ISSUES :
1. Regardless of whether charges on the monies were due in the year the piano was bought or in the year the monies were found?
2. Regardless of whether the monies found in the piano are includable as gross income of the parties?
3. Regardless of whether offended parties are qualified for capital gains treatment?
B. Keywords:
- Monies found
- Cesarini v. United States
- Treasure
- Piano
- 26 U.S. Code § 102
- Gross Income
- Gift
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
The revenue earned by team for each game is
= $10 + 50% of $8
= $10 + 4
= $14
Now the revenue for each session is
= $14 × 30 PEOPLE × 6 games
= $2,520
The total cost would be
= $100 × 3 + $1,000 × 3
= $300 + $3,000
= $3,300
And, the team would finished the season for profit of
= Revenue - cost
= $2,520 - $3,300
= $780 loss
<span>B. A felt layer underneath the tablecloth i hope this help you</span>
