Resolution
The resolution of the story is the end. All of the conflicts are solved and subplots are wrapped up. Tension usually builds as the conflict begins and becomes more complicated. The author does this through the sequence of events, language, conflict, sentence structure, tone, and mood. The resolution is not an area of tension in a story. If there is, usually it's so that there can be a sequel.
Answer:
since there is no word bank I'm taking guesses here
Explanation:
1) pajamas
2) boots
3) costume
4) piercings
5) ??? ice/icepack???
6) purse or bag
You would use a thesaurus to find a synonym for a word, and a dictionary to find the meaning of a word :)
According to authors, the most important reason for neuroscientists to study the tools of magic is that it may help scientists learn to manipulate human awareness.
<h3>What is the importance of studying the tools of magic for neuroscientists?</h3>
Psychology researchers and neuroscientist have studied magic for over a century, to provide a cognitive and perceptual understanding of how magic works in the minds of spectators
The key foundation of magic is about understanding people their experiences, awareness, and expectations. So that magicians can manipulate the assumptions of audience with precision and skill. The ability to understand perception is very important for executing and maintaining an illusion.
To know more about neuroscientists, refer
brainly.com/question/17508254
#SPJ1
C.) Both inform the reader that Faryad and Liaqat were not given the chance to tell their version of events at the police station.
In the frames, both Faryad and Liaqat put their fingerprint on a piece of paper when they are at the police station. However, neither of them are given a chance to tell their story. In Faryad's case, "the police write down what they claim has happened". The testimony in the report is not Faryad's. In Liaqat's case, after he put his fingerprint on the paper, he was told to leave and not given any interview.
Option D is incorrect because the reader is not the one responsible for investigating what Faryad and Liaqat were prevented from saying. It does make the reader curious and interested, but the reader can't do the investigation. Option B is wrong because there is no miscommunication. Option A is wrong because there is no proof or even mention of a death in either the frames or the excerpt.
