Answer:
The correct answer is A. Both Laura and Cassie are correct.
Explanation:
Since Laura says that the present value of $ 700 to be received one year from today if the interest rate is 6 percent is less than the present value of $ 700 to be received two years from today if the interest rate is 3 percent, and Cassie says that $ 700 saved for one year at 6 percent interest has a smaller future value than $ 700 saved for two years at 3 percent interest, to determine who is right, the following calculations must be performed:
700 x 1.06 = 742
700 x 1.03 ^ 2 = 742.63
Therefore, both Laura and Cassie are correct in their claims.
Answer:
Transnational strategy
Explanation:
There is a difference in global approach and Transnational approach.
In global approach, one product is sold and promoted the same way across all channels and location. While in the case of Transnational strategy, it is more like a customized or personalized approach to sell products to a particular targeted audience.
Hope this helps.
Good Luck.
Answer:
(a) Physical controls
(b) Human resource controls
(c) Independent internal verification
(d) Segregation of duties
(e) Establishment of responsibility
Explanation:
(a) All over-the-counter receipts are entered in cash registers. That is an example of the physical controls principle.
(b) All cashiers are bonded. That is an example of the human resource controls principle.
(c) Daily cash counts are made by cashier department supervisors. That is an example of the independent internal verification principle.
(d) The duties of receiving cash, recording cash, and having custody of cash are assigned to different individuals. That is an example of the segregation of duties principle.
(e) Only cashiers may operate cash registers. That is an example of the establishment of responsibility principle.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In a perfectly competitive market, all producers sell identical goods or services. Additionally, there are many buyers and sellers. Because of these two characteristics, both buyers and sellers in perfectly competitive markets are price takers. Market price is set by the forces of demand and supply.
If the seller attempts to set his own price and sets it above the market price, the seller would lose all its customers and make zero sales.
If the seller attempts to set his own price and sets it below the market price, the seller would make losses .
I hope my answer helps you.
Based on financial and accounting principles, the general message of the full disclosure principle is that "<u>the lack of evidence that something resides in a favored category will often suggest that it belongs to a less favored one."</u>
This is because the full disclosure principle state that all information should be documented in a company or individual financial statements which are believed to affect a reader's knowledge of that specific financial statement.
This ensures that every party that needs to access the financial statements under concern should fully understand them without missing any form of information.
Otherwise, any missing link or information will be ruled in favor of the less favored party in a legal situation.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option D.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/24280368
