What's the choices for answers?.
Answer:
Zimmermann rejected the assumption of fixity. Resources are not known, fixed things; they are what humans employ to service wants at a given time. To Zimmermann (1933, 3; 1951, 14), only human "appraisal" turns the "neutral stuff" of the earth into resources.[3] What are resources today may not be tomorrow, and vice versa. According to Zimmermann, "resources are not, they become."[4] "According to the definition of ew Zimmerman, the word ,"resource " does not refer to a thing but to a function which a thing may perform to an operation in which it may take part,namely,the function or operation of attaining a given end such a satisfying a want.
Explanation:
:0
Answer:
The correct term is hypodescent.
Explanation:
The anthropological term hypodescent describes a system where the people of mixed races are automatically put into the category that is considered to be socially inferior. This is not a system that acknowledges mixed race categories or degrees of racial mixing. In this notion, any racial mixing dilutes the purity of the racial categories. It is a system that tends to discourage racial mixing and intermarriage. We have the example of this kind of system in American history, which is the notion of the one-drop rule. In this framework, one drop of black ancestry made you black by the dominant social standards. This over simplifies the notions of race and it is a very discriminatory part of our history that has perpetrated systemic racism.
Answer:
The answer is A (or the first one) Im on this subject too
Explanation:
Opinion change resulting from a thoughtful focus on the content of arguments illustrates <u>"central route persuasion".</u>
<u></u>
The central route to persuasion comprises of thoughtful consideration of the contentions (thoughts, content) of the message. At the point when a recipient is doing central processing, the person is being a functioning member during the process of persuasion. The central route to persuasion happens when an individual is induced to act dependent on the arguments or the content of the message.
