Answer:
laissez-faire
Explanation:
laissez-faire leadership refers to a form of leaderships that allow the members to make their own decision based on the delegation that granted by the leaders.
When experiencing problems, this type of leaders expect the group members to be able to think on their feet and work with another to solve it without having to micromanaging everything. Despite the freedom that held by the members, research show that this type of leadership tend to have the lowest amount of productivity compared to other style of leadership.
Answer:
Hi! Ive saw your question and really wanted to answer it! Although, you didn't add the passage! Therefore I can't answer the question until you provide me with the passage. Thanks! <3
Explanation:
Answer:
d. personal and positive
Explanation:
Interpersonal relationship: It refers to the strong connection and association between different individuals who work together in a particular organization. To deliver the best performance, employees who work together should share a good bond. They portray positive gratitude, effective communication, understanding, and trust towards each other.
Advantages:
1. Less loneliness.
2. Gain self-esteem and self-knowledge.
3. Enhance emotional and physical health.
The interpersonal relationship between Ming Li and Erica is personal and positive.
Answer:
Depends!
Explanation:
It depends on what part of Colonial America you were talking about. Places like New York and the Southern colonies were typically more aristocratic, where the colony was run by a small elite number of wealthy landowners. Pennsylvania was run by the Quaker oligarchs, who held a firm control over the colonial government.
The two most "democratic" societies in Colonial America were the New England colonies and in the backcountry. Local government in New England was practiced through a "Town Meeting", where residents would get together to discuss and vote on various issues. In the backcountry, where colonial authority tended to be weak, society tended to be more egalitarian, and settlers had to work together in order to stay alive and prosper.
