A prime number<span> has only two factors: 1 and itself. A</span>composite number<span> has more than two factors. The</span>number<span> 1 is neither </span>prime<span> nor </span>composite<span>. The </span>prime numbers<span> between 2 and 31 are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 and 31 since each of these </span>numbers<span> has only two factors, itself and 1.</span>
I say it’s 2/3 I mean that line means it’s a negative but there’s no negative 2 attached to the line
Answer:
Yes, because the bike order meets the restrictions of 4c + 6a ≤ 120 and 4c + 4a ≤ 100
Step-by-step explanation:
4c + 6a ≤ 120:
You can set up the inequality 4c + 6a ≤ 120, because it takes 4 hours to build per child bike (c) and 6 hours to build an adult bike (a), all together this time cannot surpass 120 hours. That is why you use the 'less than or equal to' sign.
4c + 4a ≤ 100:
You can then set up the inequality 4c + 4a ≤ 100, because it takes 4 hours to test a child bike (c) and 4 hours to test an adult bike (a). Since 100 hours is the max amount of time they can use to test out bikes, you will use the 'less than or equal to' sign.
4(5) + 6(15) = 20 + 90 = 110. 110 is less than 120
4(5) + 4(15) = 20 + 60 = 80. 80 is less than 100
Yes, because the bike order meets the restrictions of 4c + 6a ≤ 120 and 4c + 4a ≤ 100
There are 3 toppings, the probability of picking pepperoni is 1/3.
There are 2 sizes, the probability of choosing a large would be 1/2.
The probability of picking both would be 1/3 x 1/2 = 1/6
The answer would be D. 1/6
Ok so for the first one:
-We know that the 4 angles add up to 360
-3 of the angles are given
-To find the fourth we simply subtract the sum of the 3 angles from 360.
Equation: 120+ 100+ 100 + x = 360
= 320+x= 360
Now by making x the subject
x= 360 - 320
= 40 degrees
The second one follows the same method
150+ 77+ 48+ x =360
275 +x = 360
x= 360-275
x= 85
