The headline itself is racist in nature. The headline is meant to strike balance but in the diction of the report, there is element of racism in it.
<h3>Why is the headline racist in nature?</h3>
The headline is bias through name calling such as Negroes and White. Hence, the headline is like using dirt to clean dirts. The reporter is also bias in his choice of words, so, both the report and the headline are racist in nature.
Therefore, the reaction to such report is negative and pessimistic.
learn more about racism: brainly.com/question/2864094
#SPJ1
The Bourbon Triumvirate hurted Georgia because they did not:
- really help the poor
- improve education
- improve lives of the convicts
<h3>Who were Bourbon Triumvirate?</h3>
The Bourbon Triumvirate referred to Joseph Brown, John Gordon and Alfred Colquitt; who were group of wealthy men that led the Georgia Democrats and tried to help the wealthy, white citizens of Georgia during the New South.
Despite that the Bourbon Triumvirate wanted the state of Georgia to become self-sufficient, they were not too successful at it.
Read more about Bourbon Triumvirate
<em>brainly.com/question/8306555</em>
#SPJ1
In addition to patronage, merchant families during the Renaissance began to "spread the ideas" of the Renaissance, but promoting the artwork was that based primarily in Florence outside of the region.
The correct answer is Civil rights act
This act prevented states from implementing voter limiting acts which were designed to segregate African-American people. It also had a set of laws regarding segregation in general, as in segregation in employment, education, public life, and any other similar things. Later they added the Housing act which also protected equal housing.
Explanation:
Read the source given below and answer the questions that follow:(1X4=4)
In Pakistan, General Pervez Musharraf led a military coup in October 1999. He
overthrew a democratically elected government and declared himself the ‘Chief
Executive’ of the country. Later he changed his designation to President and in
2002 held a referendum in the country that granted him a five-year extension.
Pakistani media, human rights organisations and democracy activists said that the
referendum was based on malpractices and fraud. In August 2002 he issued a
‘Legal Framework Order’ that amended the Constitution of Pakistan. According to