All categories

4 years ago

Select the proper order from least to greatest for 2⁄3, 7⁄6 , 1⁄8 , 9⁄10 .

Mathematics

2 answers:

tangare [24]4 years ago

7 0

C. 1/8, 2/3, 9/10, 7/6

Natasha_Volkova [10]4 years ago

5 0

Hello!

To order fractions from least to greatest, change the fractions so that they have a common denominator:120

$\frac{2 \times 40}{3 \times 40} = \frac{80}{120}$

$\frac{7 \times 20}{6 \times 20} = \frac{140}{120}$

$\frac{1 \times 15}{8 \times 15} = \frac{15}{120}$

$\frac{9 \times 12}{10 \times 12} = \frac{108}{120}$

Order the fractions

 $\frac{1}{8}, \frac{2}{3}, \frac{9}{10}, \frac{7}{6}$

I hope you find this useful! :)

You might be interested in

Hello everyone how are ya‘ll help plz 23x+4=30

Vlada [557]

Answer:

= 26/23

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How do equivalent fractions help when adding mixed numbers

prisoha [69]

You do the butterfly method multiply across and add or subtract. multiply the denominators to get the denominators

5 0

4 years ago

Calculus piecewise function.

Kipish [7]

Part A

The notation $\lim_{x \to 2^{+}}f(x)$ means that we're approaching x = 2 from the right hand side (aka positive side). This is known as a right hand limit.

So we could start at say x = 2.5 and get closer to 2 by getting to x = 2.4 then to x = 2.3 then 2.2, 2.1, 2.01, 2.001, etc

We don't actually arrive at x = 2 itself. We simply move closer and closer.

Since we're on the positive or right hand side of 2, this means we go with the rule involving x > 2

Therefore f(x) = (x/2) + 1

Plug in x = 2 to find that...

f(x) = (x/2) + 1

f(2) = (2/2) + 1

f(2) = 2

This shows $\lim_{x \to 2^{+}}f(x) = 2$

Then for the left hand limit $\lim_{x \to 2^{-}}f(x)$ , we'll involve x < 2 and we go for the first piece. So,

f(x) = 3-x

f(2) = 3-2

f(2) = 1

Therefore, $\lim_{x \to 2^{-}}f(x) = 1$

===============================================================

Part B

Because $\lim_{x \to 2^{+}}f(x) \ne \lim_{x \to 2^{-}}f(x)$ this means that the limit $\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)$ does not exist.

If you are a visual learner, check out the graph below of the piecewise function. Notice the gap or disconnect at x = 2. This can be thought of as two roads that are disconnected. There's no way for a car to go from one road to the other. Because of this disconnect, the limit doesn't exist at x = 2.

===============================================================

Part C

You'll follow the same type of steps shown in part A.

However, keep in mind that x = 4 is above x = 2, so we'll deal with x > 2 only.

So you'd only involve the second piece f(x) = (x/2) + 1

You should find that f(4) = 3, and that both left and right hand limits equal this value. The left and right hand limits approach the same y value. The limit does exist here. There are no gaps to worry about when x = 4.

===============================================================

Part D

As mentioned earlier, since $\lim_{x \to 4^{+}}f(x) = \lim_{x \to 4^{-}}f(x) = 3$ , this means the limit $\lim_{x \to 4}f(x)$ does exist and it's equal to 3.

As x gets closer and closer to 4, the y values are approaching 3. This applies to both directions.

4 0

2 years ago

36- 2x=-X+2

Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

ok so this is a multi step equation so it requires to put your terms together so you would take -x and add it to 2x which would be 3x then you would subtract 36 from 2 and that would get your answer

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

3 0

3 years ago

N। How do you solve and get the answer

pickupchik [31]

Answer:

7/9

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers