They didnt like them, or their policies, thats mostly why the Revolutionary War started
Answer:
The correct answer is D. Judges in a common law system have the power to interpret the common law so that it applies to the unique circumstances of an individual case.
Explanation:
The common law system is based, above all, on the analysis of judicial sentences handed down by the same court or one of its higher courts (those to which decisions made by said court can be appealed) and on the interpretations that in these sentences are given from the laws. This is why the laws can be ambiguous in many respects, as the courts are expected to clarify them (or they have already done so on previous, but similar, laws).
On the other hand, there are judicial interpretations that create new legal figures, which in the beginning was the norm, but today is the exception. However, the nomenclature that recognizes as a statutory offense, for example, the offense created by law, is maintained. At present, it is much more common for laws to create completely new figures or to standardize and set the rules previously established by court sentences.
A very important detail is that, in subsequent cases, the sufficient reason of the sentences previously handed down obliges a court (and all courts below this) to fail to the same way or similarly. This is why the study of the system is based on the detailed analysis of the sentences from which the norm is induced, a study that ends in the elaboration of a "typical case", which is compared with the situation under study to see if it is similar or not. On many occasions, several sentences containing the same principle, viewed from different perspectives, are analyzed to finally extract the rule that will be applied to the case under study.
Forensic psychologist would be consulted in jury selection and witness preparation.
These psychologists are there to apply their knowledge of psychology when it comes to legal cases. So here, this psychologist would have to prepare the jury for being in a court, tell them what to expect, recommend how they should behave and what they should look like, etc.
Answer: An example of how individual actions are constrained by sociological circumstances is (D) David's decision to abstain from eating pork because his religion demands it.
Explanation: The concept "sociological circumstance" is used to refer to<u> the social factors, such as ideas, principles or activities, that surround and have an influence on a particular individual.</u> In that way, sociological circumstances limit a person's behaviour and actions. David's decision to abstain from eating pork because his religion demands it is an example of a constraint generated by a sociological circumstance because<u> the principles of the religion he believes in and that surrounds him restrict his choices.</u> In other words, <u>his religion limits the way in which David is supposed to act and eat. </u>
Answer:
Rapid Growth of Population
Increase in Incomes
Deficit Spending for Development
Increase in Money Supply
Inadequate Agricultural Output
Inadequate Industrial Production
High-priced Imports
Explanation:
