Answer:
all citizens may be able to vote regardless of colour or social status and the government does not have the authority to change this (shall not be denied or abridged by the United States), but this does not include women as they do not strictly mention gender. Previous condition of servitude likely refers to how slavery was abolished and that former slaves shall also have the voting right.
Explanation:
"The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or <em>previous condition of servitude</em>."
Answer:
slave revolts!
Explanation:
Hello!
Slave owners lived in constant fear of slave revolts, and justly so. The average holding varied between four and six slaves, and at the peak of slavery in the US slaves occupied more than 20% of the population. If slaves were to get fed up with their horrible situation they might be able to overpower their masters and begin freeing slaves from other plantations. These fears were further amplified by the Hattian Rebellion in 1791 in which the local slaves brutally killed 75,000 French citizens, gaining their freedom in the process. Many in the United States feared that a similar situation would unfold if their slaves rebelled en masse.
Hope This Helps!
H.M
More info:
https://teachinghistory.org/history-content/ask-a-historian/25577
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Haitian-Revolution
The Dred Scott decision<span> served as an eye-opener to Northerners who ... to regulate</span>slavery<span> in </span>new territories<span>, these once-skeptics reasoned, ... to the reality instead, that the </span>Supreme Court has made<span> Illinois a </span>slave<span> State. ... </span>did<span> not stop </span>slavery<span> now, they might never again </span>have<span> the chance. </span>
One would be <span>Closely followed the policies of his precedessor and patron Andrew Jackson and was a key organizer of the Jacksonian Democratic Party</span>
