The penalty was a 10 year moratorium on Chinese labor immigration. its was called the Chinese Exclusion Act
This is a conflict of individual rights versus state protection. For some, the individual rights come first even if it is an attack on others or could put the country at risk. For others, the protection of the country is more important and therefore a person who speaks in a way that threatens the country should and can be silenced.
Schenck v. US is a famous case where the court ruled if the speech presents a danger to the country then the 1st Amendment right is not applicable and can be denied.
Tinker v. Des Moines School District demonstrated when a person peacefully protest even in a school against the government and their decisions (Vietnam War in this case), then the 1st Amendment is applied and the individual rights upheld.
Answer:
Taking into account that these are the alternatives:
A. Fostering efficiency in the workplace
B. Promoting business monopolies
C. Creating economics reform
D. Protecting social welfare
The correct option is B. Promoting business monopolies
The objective that progressivism had was essentially to give the power of the government to the people. It also wanted to change american lifestyle by eliminating injustice. The progressive movement also cared for different points, such as women rights, environmental issues and social welfare.