Answer:
By a vote of 5-4, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Massachusetts and against the EPA. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the majority opinion. First, the court argued that Massachusetts and the environmental advocacy groups had standing to challenge the EPA in court.
Explanation:
ok
Answer:
No, it definitely was not pure racism.
Explanation:
While individuals who have pure hatred and racist views against other groups of people have always existed, during the centuries that slavery existed, not everyone who owned slaves or supported slavery justified their position on the basis of racist arguments.
Very often, these arguments in favor of racism were made from an economic point of view. They justified slavery because slavery was fundamental for their economic well-being. Some people even justified slavery under supposedly moral, ethical, or religious reasons, arguing that slaves were better off under the control of their owners, or that some religious scripture justified slavery.
Answer:
displacement-hidden cost
Explanation:
There is a supported notion that crime do not simply disappear, but it relocates after any prevention initiative or police patrols are beefed-up. In this case instead of eliminating the crime, displacement-hidden cost would occur, as the individuals committing the crime will clearly move from the area of preventive focus to another area where there are no crime prevention measures yet.
Answer:
Dissociative identity disorder (DID) is a rare psychiatric disorder diagnosed in about 1.5% of the global population. This disorder is often misdiagnosed and often requires multiple assessments for an accurate diagnosis
Explanation: