The primary weakness of this passage is:
- D, The passage fails to make a debatable claim
<h3>What is a Debatable Claim?</h3>
A debatable claim is a thought or primary message that is arguable. A debatable claim has strong language that shows the certainty of the speaker.
The claim made in the above text is weak because it gives no room for strong academic debate.
Learn more about debatable claims here:
brainly.com/question/21661776
#SPJ1
Answer:
The French Revolution was a period of major social upheaval that began in 1787 and ended in 1799. It sought to completely change the relationship between the rulers and those they governed and to redefine the nature of political power.Explanation: I learned about this in 8th grade
Answer:
He plans to remove Lepidus from power once he has served his purpose.
Explanation:
In William Shakespeare's play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar", the character of Lepidus has just three dialogues in the whole play. He was to be one of the three members of the Second Triumvirate, after the death of Julius Caesar.
Antony plans to use Lepidus as much as he can but he thinks that he is not worthy to be a part of the new Second Triumvirate. In Act Act IV scene i, we see the three members of the Second Triumvirate - Antony, Octavius and Lepidus deciding who should be killed for the murder of Caesar. Lepidus's brother and Antony's nephew must also die for their involvement in the murder. After that was decided, Antony sent Lepidus to go and get Caesar's will from his house. After he left, Antony remarked to Octavius that Lepidus is just meant to obey orders and not be a leader, not fit for being a part of the Triumvirate. He said that "<em>He must be taught and trained and bid go forth, A barren-spirited fellow, one that feeds On objects, arts, and imitations</em>". This shows that he plans to remove Lepidus from power once he has served his purpose.
<span>C) "Of course it is wrong to let young people miss out on quality education." </span>
Contrapositive is the negation of both the premise and the conclusion. in the other order
Let's take:
conditional statemet: all men are mortal (if one is a man, one is mortal)
the counterpositive is :
is one is not mortal, one is not a man - this statement is also true.
So, the correct answer is: its counterpositice is also true
