Answer:
This proposal will not work.
Explanation:
All taxes work the same way, it doesn't matter if they are payroll taxes or taxes on goods or services. In this case, labor is the service provided by the employees (suppliers) and the employer is the consumer. A tax increase will reduce the demand for labor, and therefore the equilibrium price of labor (wage) will also decrease. If wages decreases, then workers are not going to be better off, on the contrary they will be worse off. This tax increase will lower both the wage and the employment level.
Answer:
The company should print the 3,000 units of Tennessee as they will yield a gain for 3,000 dollars.
Because it faces economies of scale it should sale for as much as it can from a given pattern
Explanation:
Profit: revenue - variable cost - fixed cost
Profit = 15*Q - 8*Q - 18,000
Profit = 7Q- 18,000
3,000 Tennessee shirts x $7 contribution per shirt - 18,000 setup cost
profit: 21,000 - 18,000 = 3,000
Profit maximization: Marginal revenue = marginal cost
Total Revenue: 15 x Q
dTR' /dQ = 15
dTR''/dQ = 0
cost function: 18,000 + 7Q
dC'/dQ = 7
dC''/dQ = 0
Sport Tee faces a economie of scale their cost do not increase over time. Sport Tee should sale as many shirt as it possible can
Answer:
A. Values
Explanation:
Although, the above explanations entails or encompasses what values are, manners and customs of people in a country; however, values is what summarizes the whole passage.
Values are what a given society holds in high esteem. They are basic and fundamental beliefs that controls actions in a given society. Values may be right or wrong according to the philosophies of those who believes in such, it is however very important because it helps a society determines what is important I.e something that is good, worthwhile and very much desirable.
<span>This is most likely an example of a franchise opportunity. It could also be considered to be a hybrid type of franchise where the indepenent dealers have more leeway in how the business looks and how it is run. This would be a win/win for many independent dealers as the would still be making most of the local decisions.</span>
<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
