The subject pronoun in the sentence is "they."
In the short story "Harrison Bergeron," George and Hazel are Harrison's parents, and they live in a world that imposes equality through the use of handicaps.
<h3>What happens in the story?</h3>
In Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron," George and Hazel are Harrison's parents. They live in a futuristic world where the government tries to enforce equality by making people wear handicaps. No one is allowed to be more intelligent or beautiful, for example, than another person.
George wears a handicap to prevent him from being too intelligent. Hazel, on the other hand, is completely average, so she wears no handicaps whatsoever. Harrison wears several, since he is handsome, smart, and strong. He ends up in prison for removing them, but he escapes.
Harrison appears on TV and removes his handicaps once again. He ends up being killed by the government while his mother watches. However, since she is not smart enough to understand what just happened, she cannot even tell his father that their son has died.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided above is correct.
Learn more about "Harrison Bergeron" here:
brainly.com/question/11433020
#SPJ1
Answer:
D
Explanation:
it was ended after 6 months on December 14 1812
hope this helps <3333
Incomplete question. However, I assumed you are referring to the story, "Fahrenheit" 451 by Ray Bradbury.
<u>Explanation:</u>
For example, in the novel, the character Clarisse is portrayed as someone who appreciates nature, so much so that she finds time always to observe creation even though most people in her community are preoccupied with work and entertainment that they lack the time to do so.
Another character is Mildred, the wife of Montag, she is portrayed as someone who has a love for entertainment that is so strong to the extent it overshadows that of her husband. Her behavior contrast with that of Clarisse who has a healthy view of entertainment.
What the author, Montag is saying through his characters is that
- those in his society do not value human life, recall we were told the police don't punish those who over speed, thus accidents occur often.
- those in his society are less concerned about their families; which was made evident in the case of Mildred.
The correct answer is Machiavelli “The Prince” evoked so much discussion and controversy for the following reason.
In “The Prince” Machiavelli shares many political principles that created controversy at the time, but even today are of great influence on some politicians around the globe. Among the controversial ideas he stated, we find:
“The end justifies the means”. This is interpreted as one individual can make any decision or do something to accomplish the result he wants. It doesn’t matter if he messes with other peoples ideas or steps over other people´s principles.
“For a Prince, it is better to be feared than to be loved”. This idea created controversy because it invites the ruler to establish the kind of government that provokes fear instead of respect or love. Machiavelli considered that if people loved the ruler, it could appear as weak. But if the ruler was strong and provoked fear, the consequences would be the control of its people.
“The Prince should act virtuously, but should not avoid acting with cruelty if employing it would benefit the State”. This also created great controversy. It is common sense to believe that the ruler must be correct and respectful. But Machiavelli considered that the opposite, when needed and in favor of the State, was possible and convenient for the Prince.
“People admire generosity, honor, and courage in others, but most of them do not exhibit those values themselves”. Machiavelli understood that people are aware a support moral values in others but it is difficult for them to exemplify those values with its own behaviors.
