Answer: Dan would likely respond to a high or low pricing strategy.
Explanation: A pricing strategy is a plan used to determine the price and maximize profits of a commodity either as a single unit or as the general commodity in the market.
Dan has been known to be sensitive to the price of goods will definitely respond if the prices are high or low because he'd be up to date with what the prices should be
Answer:
No
Explanation:
External validity refers to being able to apply the results of the research experiment to real life situations. Therefore based on the information provided in the question it can be said that Dr. Rajah's experiment does not have external validity. This is mainly due to the fact that brain teasers are problems that does not reflect on real world problems or events.
If a person simply won't deal with a problem and doesn't care how it turns out, that person has an avoidance conflict management style.
<h3>What are the five dispute resolution techniques?</h3>
There are five main styles of conflict management, including competing, avoiding, accommodating, and compromising, according to the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI), which is used by human resource (HR) experts worldwide.
<h3>A real-world illustration of the compromised style is?</h3>
On how to proceed, you and your partner disagree. Your partner wants to urge the crews to work longer hours, five days a week, while you want to ask the customer for a two-week extension.
To learn more about Thomas-Kilmann here:
brainly.com/question/29314023
#SPJ4
4. Add encouraging words while giving feedback.
* This is a good practice in terms of feedback. It is good to highlight strengths as you point out areas of improvement. Through encouragement, they are able to feel that improvement is a possibility for them.
For number 1, when offering criticism, you are not looking for an apology. you are looking to encourage improvement.
As for number 2, although it is good to make things clear, workers or people typically respond better to rewards rather than punishment.
Number 3, is not a good practice because constructive criticism should be done privately and not in a group setting. It may make the receiver feel like they are being singled-out.
Number 5, the point of criticism is to point out areas of improvement and at the same time, show or give examples as to how they can improve. Giving solutions and ideas during feedback will help the receiver understand what they did wrong and how they were supposed to do it.
a compass shows cardinal directions
