Answer:
because in March and April 1940, on the pretext of German aggression, bridge plans for an invasion of Norway we're prepared, mainly in order to reach and destroy the Sweden iron ore miles Gallivare.it was hope that this would divert German forces away from France, and open a word friend in South Sweden.
They needed to find new food sources
The correct answers are A) Hrothgar and his men. B) Beowulf and his men.
<em>The comitatus relationships that are shown in Beowulf are Hrothgar and his men and Beowulf and his men.
</em>
A comitatus relationship is an ancient term used for the first time in the epoch of the Roman Empire. It refers to the special relationship that rulers had with their servants that protected him. Later, in Anglo-Saxon stories, the term meant the respected relationships between the ruler and its thanes or personal guards, in Scotland. The relationship could be positive, instilling respect in people or it could be negative, instilling fear. In the case of Beowulf, the relationship is based on respect and honor.
It began with the fall of the Western Roman Empire and merged into the Renaissance
Andrew Jackson started the "Bank War" over the rechartering of the Second Bank of the United States. Proponents of the bank said that it encouraged westward expansion, expanded international commerce using credit, and helped reduce the government's debt. Jackson, on the other hand, was heavily against the BUS, calling it a danger to the liberties of the people. A champion for the rights of the common man, he advocated to protect the farmers and laborers. He claimed that the bank was owned by a small group of upperclass men, who only became richer by pocketing the money paid by the poorer common man for loans.
Jackson argued against the constitutionality of the BUS that was upheld about fourteen years before, during the 1819 McCulloch v. Maryland case. One of the points of the unanimous decision in that case stated that Congress had the power to establish the bank. Jackson, however, said that McCulloch v. Maryland could not prevent him from declaring a presidential veto on the bank if he believed it unconstitutional. He said that the decision in that 1819 case “ought not to control the coordinate authorities of this Government. The Congress, the Executive, and the Court must each for itself be guided by its own opinion of the Constitution," meaning that the 1819 decision could not control his interpretation of the Constitution or prevent him from doing what he thought was right. This point of view earned him the nickname "King Andrew I" from his critics, who saw his use of the veto and his attempted intrusion on congressional power as power-hungry behavior. In the end, Jackson was successful in challenging the bank, as its charter expired in 1836. He had successfully killed the "monster" that was the Bank of the United States.
