Answer:
Cultural Convergance
Explanation:
Think of this to help you remember
<em><u>C</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>&</u></em><em><u>'</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>P</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>l</u></em> share their root ending, <em><u>-</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u>,</u></em><em><u> </u></em> meaning at least 2 , but no less
<em><u>C</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>v</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>g</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>c</u></em><em><u>e</u></em> is just a big word for bring together and make it one, equal or whole. So , <em><u>C</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>C</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>v</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>g</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>c</u></em><em><u>e</u></em> , means the joining, combing or "converging/merging" together 2 or more reasonably different ways of living, different types of beliefs/morals, clothing needs to be made to accompany new styles to, more construction to meet population standards...
But to pretty much sumn up why <em><u>C</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>C</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>v</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>g</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>c</u></em><em><u>e</u></em> is your correct answer
This is true and the after-dinner speeches did develop in England
during that time and their purpose was mainly to entertain or to state something
important but in humorous way. Any topic could discussed if it was approached
humorously and even though its main purpose was to entertain it could also be a
bit informational and persuasive.
The relationship between the Native Americans and the French is very similar to the relationship between the Dutch and the Natives.
<h3>How was the relationship between the French and the Native Americans?</h3>
The relationship between the French and the Native Americans can be labeled as a relationship of respect in which the French recognized the natives as individuals equal to them who had rights and duties unlike other Europeans who saw the natives as slaves and human beings. lower.
<h3>How did the natives relate to the Dutch?</h3>
In general, the relationship between the Dutch and the Native Americans was good because there were no attacks or confrontations. On the contrary, there was collaboration to establish a Dutch commercial point in North America. Later, they had to give in to British pressure and leave the place.
Learn more about native americans in: brainly.com/question/8678061
#SPJ1
European leaders were slow to stop the advances of Hitler and Mussolini because they were stil reeling from World War I and hoped to avoid another large-scale conflict - D. Despite saying this, the European nations had a sense of what was to come, only that they didn't really think it would come at such a vast price and body count tag.
Answer:
Panama Canal, Spanish Canal de Panamá, lock-type canal, owned and administered by the Republic of Panama, that connects the Atlantic and Pacific oceans through the narrow Isthmus of Panama. The length of the Panama Canal from shoreline to shoreline is about 40 miles (65 km) and from deep water in the Atlantic (more specifically, the Caribbean Sea) to deep water in the Pacific about 50 miles (82 km). The canal, which was completed in August 1914, is one of the two most strategic artificial waterways in the world, the other being the Suez Canal. Ships sailing between the east and west coasts of the United States, which otherwise would be obliged to round Cape Horn in South America, shorten their voyage by about 8,000 nautical miles (15,000 km) by using the canal. Savings of up to 3,500 nautical miles (6,500 km) are also made on voyages between one coast of North America and ports on the other side of South America. Ships sailing between Europe and East Asia or Australia can save as much as 2,000 nautical miles (3,700 km) by using the canal.
Importance:
Before the Panama Canal was built, ships traveling between the east and west coasts of the American continents had to go around Cape Horn in South America, a voyage that was some 8,000 nautical miles longer then going through the canal and that took about two months to complete. All journeys between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans are shortened by thousands of nautical miles by going through the canal.