1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zvonat [6]
3 years ago
12

The Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) monitored

History
2 answers:
Anna71 [15]3 years ago
7 0
Railroad operations but in a broad sense all transportation operations
BartSMP [9]3 years ago
6 0

B.  railroad operations

The Interstate Commerce Commission was created as one of the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887. The Interstate Commerce Act made prices to ship goods via railroads fair for all who had products to ship, so that small farmers no longer had to pay more than bigger companies.

Railroads had been giving favorable treatment and prices to major companies for shipping freight on rail lines.  The Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 aimed to end such practices.  The act contained provisions such as:

... All railroads were required to set fair and reasonable shipping rates.

... Charging different rates for a similar service was declared illegal.

... Railroads could not charge more for short-haul services than a proportional rate of long-haul services on the same route.

... Railroads were forbidden from providing favorable treatment to any person or company or location.

... Railroads were required to display their rates and not charge higher than their posted rates.

You might be interested in
The right to vote in the United States was inspired by the principles of democratic rule found in two ancient civilizations: Gre
Scilla [17]

Answer:

Heres mine

Explanation:

I think that they should let voting remain optional because there are some people who cant decide who to vote and it will put a lot of stress on them so it will push them to vote randomly. You can also die from too much stress! That is why I think they should let voting become optional.

If they enact a compulsory voting law then a lot of people will probably protest and there will be a lot of danger and riots because of it. When there are alot of riots it will lead to a nation crisis and people will suffer a lot because of it.

This is just my opinion and people might disagree with me but I personally think voting should remain optional.

6 0
3 years ago
By what year did Cairo come under Muslim control?
kkurt [141]
It came under control in 641
8 0
3 years ago
The case of India: Ending British Rule
mixer [17]
The Indian case of attaining self rule is one of the most read nationalism stories in the world. the movement was led by Gandhi who advocated for use of peaceful means of attaining independence. Gandhi was against violent conflicts and whenever violent protests broke out,he would go on hunger strikes. Gandhi methods however would not have been successful were it not for the changing  global dynamics resulting from the  ww2.
4 0
3 years ago
To what extent does the U.S. Constitution address the ideals of the Declaration of Independence? (To a great extent, little exte
Ghella [55]

Answer:

Explanation:

As part of the Compromise of 1850, the Fugitive Slave Act was amended and the slave trade in Washington, D.C., was abolished. Furthermore, California entered the Union as a free state and a territorial government was created in Utah.

The Missouri Compromise was struck down as unconstitutional, and slavery and anti-slavery proponents rushed into the territory to vote in favor or against the practice. The rush, effectively led to massacre known as Bleeding Kansas and propelled itself into the very real beginnings of the American Civil War.

Overview

The Compromise of 1850 acted as a temporary truce on the issue of slavery, primarily addressing the status of newly acquired territory after the Mexican-American War.

Under the Compromise, California was admitted to the Union as a free state; the slave trade was outlawed in Washington, D.C., a strict new Fugitive Slave Act compelled citizens of free states to assist in capturing enslaved people; and the new territories of Utah and New Mexico would permit white residents to decide whether to allow slavery.

Ultimately, the Compromise did not resolve the issue of slavery’s expansion; instead, the fiery rhetoric surrounding the Compromise further polarized the North and the South.

The Mexican Cession begs the slavery question

At the end of the Mexican-American War, the United States gained a large piece of western land known as the Mexican Cession.

Map depicting the area of the Mexican Cession, including the present-day states of California, Nevada, Utah, and portions of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming.

Map depicting the area of the Mexican Cession, including the present-day states of California, Nevada, Utah, and portions of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming.

The Mexican Cession.

The issue of whether to permit slavery in the territories organized in this new land consumed Congress at the end of the 1840s. During the war, Congressman David Wilmot introduced the Wilmot Proviso, a proposal to ban slavery in any new territory acquired from Mexico. The measure passed in the House of Representatives but failed in the Senate.

Congress was also seeking resolutions for several other controversial matters. Antislavery advocates wanted to end the slave trade in the District of Columbia, while proslavery advocates aimed to strengthen fugitive slave laws. But the most pressing problem was California: the many emigrants who had flocked to the territory upon the discovery of gold in the late 1840s had forced the question of its statehood and status as a slave or free state.

The presidential election of 1848 determined which of these issues would be tackled first. Southern Mexican-American war military hero Zachary Taylor was elected president in 1848, much to the satisfaction of southern slaveholders. Although Taylor himself owned more than one hundred slaves, he prioritized national unity over sectional interests. He called on Congress to admit California as a free state.

A ban on slave trading in Washington, DC: Antislavery advocates welcomed Congress’s ban on the slave trade in Washington, DC, although slavery itself continued to be legal in the capital.

Most Americans breathed a sigh of relief over the deal brokered in 1850, choosing to believe it had saved the Union. However, the compromise stood as a temporary truce in an otherwise white-hot sectional conflict. Popular sovereignty paved the way for unprecedented violence in the West over the question of slavery.

(hope this helps can i plz have brainlist :D hehe)

8 0
3 years ago
Why would a presenter choose to use this table? to show which side was winning the Civil War to predict how long the Civil War w
SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer:

The answer is D

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how the 19th century America pioneer would view acquiring American Indian land as justifiable
    10·2 answers
  • What allows the president to reject any act of congress?
    10·1 answer
  • In the 19th century, which trait was used to label a person as Caucasoid?
    8·1 answer
  • One major reason European countries engaged in imperialism in the late 19tb century was to
    8·2 answers
  • Did Andrew Jackson's response to the nullification crisis promote democracy
    6·1 answer
  • Who created a solar powered rover for exploration and research
    5·2 answers
  • West Africa ships were loaded with trade goods. Then the ships_________
    6·1 answer
  • The teacher reviewing this sentence would point out that since this is a
    14·1 answer
  • Who was the leader of the first revolutionary force for Mexico? a. José Bernardo Gutiérrez b. Philip Nolan c. John Long d. Fathe
    8·2 answers
  • Please help, I'm trying to get my project done as quick as possible since it's already late!!
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!