Answer: The answer Because all three candidates were Progressive, Progressive votes were split. Basically divided so its "B"
The election of 1912 was between Woodrow Wilson, Teddy Roosevelt, and William Howard Taft. All three of these individuals were progressives, even though Wilson technically in the Democratic party and Taft was part of the Republican party. This was a time period in which progressive ideas were extremely popular in all major political parties. Due to this fact, the progressive voters were torn on which candidate to pick. Ultimately, Wilson ends up winning the election of 1912.
Because all three major candidates were Progressive, Progressive votes were split.
Explanation: Because all three major candidates were Progressive, Progressive votes were split" is the one among the following that is true of the 1912 presidential election. Because all three major candidates were Progressive, Progressive votes were split" is the one among the following that is true of the 1912 presidential election.
The correct answer to this question is B) both groups used gunpowder weapons to establish extensive empires in the Middle East.
The Sunni Muslims and the Shia Muslims are similar because both groups used gunpowder weapons to establish extensive empires in the Middle East.
The Sunni Muslims are the majority of Muslims. They are very religious people, following the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad. The Sunni Muslims accept the teachings of the six books of Hadith, attributed to Muhammad. The Shia Muslims believe that Ali is their main leader. Ali is the son of Muhammad. Shia Muslims are the second large population of Muslims, only behind the Sunni. Among the similarities of both Muslims, we find that both groups used gunpowder weapons to establish extensive empires in the Middle East.
Generally speaking, judicial activism is the opposite of judicial restraint in that when a judge is especially "active," he or she imposes more of his or her own will in the case, whereas if a judge is more "restrained," they rely more on precedent.
The Court's ruling effectively freed corporations and unions to spend money both on "electioneering communications" and to directly advocate for the election or defeat of candidates (although not to contribute directly to candidates or political parties).
Federalism is a mixed form of government in which power is shared, ideally equally, between a central (federal) government and region (state) governments.
Federalism generally reduced the rights of the states, since they became actors within a federal system and limited in their powers, rather than operating as their own distinct entities.
