Answer:
he convinced the French crown to back the colonies in their fight to become independent of British authority.
Explanation:
Answer: Yes Britan took Raj
Explanation: I think that this should be correct
´The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
One way in which the legacy of imperialism affected the economic development of new states in the second half of the twentieth century in the countries of Africa.
After European nations allow independence to most of the African nations, these African countries have been immersed in poverty, hunger, social problems, and diseases. This can be an example of the legacy they left after years of imperialism in Africa.
Let's remember that at the end of the 1800s and the beginning of the 1900s, European superpowers agreed to split the African territory in what was known as the "Scramble for Africa." European nations such as France, Portugal, Great Britain. Germany or Belgium, split the African territories to colonize them and exploit the many raw materials and natural resources.
When the Europeans left those territories, the African people did not what to do after so many years of dependence.
Right now, all their struggles are consequences of that European imperialism.
Featured snippet from the web
Federalists wanted a strong central government that would rule the people of the United States directly and not through the state governments. Anti-federalists wanted a weak central government... ... Federalist were for a system of strong federal courts while Anti-federalists were for limits on the federal courts. (btw im army too :) )
