Answer:
the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise
Explanation:
When the Articles of Confederation underwent revision, there were many issues that were discussed. One of the major issues was the debate over the the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise. According to the Great Compromise, an equal right was to be distributed among the citizens to choose the representatives.
In the Three-Fifths Compromise, no debates were initiated on the issue of the complete abolition of slavery and granting them the citizenship. The slaves were agreed to be counted to be the three-fifth of the individual who were liable for taxation and representation.
Answer:
pugachev's rebellion was principal revolt
Answer:
Fifth Amendment
Explanation:
The fifth constitutional amendment prevents a citizen from being abused by the United States' legal and state authority. In this case, the fifth property allows an accused to have the right to remain silent and the right to be tried only once for the same facts, which prevents a person accused of a crime from being tried again because the legal body has found new evidence. This can be applied in the case shown in the question above, where the state wants to try Luke again for the same facts. This is prohibited by the fifth constitutional amendment.
The Us were able to find same Cuban products from other supplier countries, while the Cuban country had to find other suppliers.
Cuba was not able to develop a high commerce with the US and the surounding countries were not necessarily the best ones to make business with. Cuba had the support from the former USSR until 1989 when it was disolved. Russia continued helping but not at the same level or amount as before.
Great Britain is the <span>land that was promised to the iroquois confederacy after the british conquered the fort of ticonderoga. They ensured that they will all cover the expenses in the war but the result to this is the bankrupt of its treasures.</span>
