The narrator talks about a place where trees bear a lot of fruit. Cluade McKay was born in the West Indies where the place was loaded with trees just like the ones he describes in the first part of his poem.
<span>Langston Hughes is very angry. The term "Brother" has a new non-biblical context in his time. He's showing the duality of the term, not a new "universal" kinship. Sometimes his brother is black, sometimes his brother is white.
</span>
and the last one it's a history that i need to find :)
Answer:
They provide false reasons in support of a claim, making the writer seem less credible.
Explanation:
The use of fallacy is using faulty arguments to support the opinion. At the first glance, the fallacious opinion can seem better than it is, but it is not supported by facts, and the reader can have the feeling the writer is dishonest.
By using fallacies, the writer is discrediting his work and words.
Answer:
the stone to a quiver
Explanation:
simile as a comparison using the word as in the text it states, " reset the stone as one would cap a quiver." so that's the simile
<span>Ross arrives and announces that Macbeth is to be the new Thane of Cawdor, thus confirming the first prophecy of the Witches. Banquo and Macbeth are struck dumb for the second time, but now Shakespeare contrasts their responses. Banquo is aware of the possibility that the prophecies may have been the work of supernatural dark forces, as exemplified in his lines "What? Can the Devil speak true?" (108) and "oftentimes, to win us to our harm, / The instruments of Darkness tell us truths . . . — (only) to betray us" (123-125). Macbeth is more ambiguous. His speech is full of what will now become his trademark — questioning, doubting, weighing up, and seeking to justify: "This supernatural soliciting / Cannot be ill; cannot be good" (130-131).</span>
