Answer:
the type of reinforcement is a determinant of stimulus control
Explanation:
Appetitive situations are such which the situation that requires to fulfill the body needs. Appetitive situations are mainly controlled by visuals indications or cues. For example, when we are hungry, by seeing food makes us feel more hungry which is increases the effectiveness of food.
And aversive situations are considered as unpleasant stimuli that makes us to change our nature or behavior through positive punishment or negative reinforcement .
Thus this stimuli demonstrates the type of reinforcement which affects the outcome of any stimulus control.
Hence the answer is --
" the type of reinforcement is a determinant of stimulus control "
<h3><u>President in role of Head of the State:</u></h3>
The president of America, practices both as the state's head and also as the chief executive. He is the head of the country with certain powers in his hands which he can exercise when needed. The president performs many ceremonial roles, and represents the nations in many forms, as the state's head.
And, working as the chief executive, the president helps in directing activities to the thousands of employees of the branch who can carry our lawful activities. In previous era's, the head of the state was known as the king or the queen, who took care of their nation with utmost care, keeping their citizens above all.
Answer:
d. Forcing
Explanation:
Forcing technique: The term "forcing technique" is described as one of the different techniques of conflict resolution in which an individual tends to use some power or formal authority that he or she possesses in order to satisfy his or her concern in the absence of any regard associated with the party or person with whom he or she in conflict with.
In the question above, the given statement represents the forcing technique of conflict resolution.
Answer:
following rules of everywhere
Answer:
c. predictive validity
Explanation:
In research, the term predictive validity refers to the fact that a score in a test or the performance on a task is related to the performance in another test or task that is evaluated in the future after the first test. So, the first test/criterion will likely predict how the person will do in the second one.
In this example students take a college entrance exam and it's been observed that the ones who do well in them, do well in their first year of college. We can see that <u>the score in the entrance exam will likely predict how the students will do during their first year of college</u>. Therefore, these exams have predictive validity.
