1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Harrizon [31]
3 years ago
13

Giving away brainilest.

English
1 answer:
vagabundo [1.1K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:Because your goal for this essay is to discuss how Shakespeare transformed the original source, you’ll want to focus, first, on what they both have in common (comparing similar attributes).  Then, you’ll want to focus on how elements of similarities were changed or how new things entirely were added or how things may have even been omitted (contrast).   This can be done in one of two ways—block or point by point.  

If you format the essay in block format, you’ll first discuss in a paragraph or two elements selected for discussion in “Pyramus and Thisbe.”  Then, after you finish discussing Ovid’s myth, you’ll discuss, also in a paragraph or two, the elements being compared/contrasted in Shakespeare’s work.  Be sure to discuss the same points in the same order in block method.  A compare/contrast essay in this method might resemble the following:

INTRO PARAGRAPH

BODY PARAGRAPH – Ovid

Attribute 1

Attribute 2

Attribute 3

BODY PARAGRAPH – Shakespeare

Attribute 1

Attribute 2

Attribute 3

CONCLUSION

Another method used when constructing a compare/contrast essay is called point by point.  In this format, you will discuss elements of both works within the same paragraph and do so point by point.  An essay constructed in this manner might resemble the following:

INTRODUCTION

PARAGRAPH

Attribute from Ovid

Same attribute from Shakespeare

PARAGRAPH

Attribute from Ovid

Same attribute from Shakespeare

PARAGRAPH

Attribute from Ovid

Same attribute from Shakespeare

CONCLUSION

In this type for format, be sure to always discuss the same work first.  Thus, Ovid should always be mentioned first, then you’ll follow that up with a discussion of Shakespeare because, after all, you are supposed to be discussing how Shakespeare changed things, and this would make the most sense.   Point by point would probably be the most efficient manner in which to highlight the transformations made by Shakespeare since it would keep both elements fresh within the mind/eye of the reader.

Compare and contrast means to analyze the similarities and differences between the myth and the play.

For example: Difference: The story of Pyramus and Thisbe is a tragedy, while the play is a comedy.

Similarity: The characters' basic situation is the same in both the play and the myth.

Then, put these ideas into paragraphs with a conclusion and introduction.

Talk about how Shakespeare transformed the sources by turning it from a tragedy to a comedy, and how he also stayed true to the source by keeping the characters and the main events they engage in the same.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Question 3 of 5
frosja888 [35]

Answer:

O D. In addition to being more widely available, mutts generally suffer

from fewer health problems than purebred dogs.

Explanation: this is a factual claim..it can be proven right or wrong depending on the dog

5 0
2 years ago
Mutiple choice question need help Now!!!! 15pts
sweet-ann [11.9K]

The answer is (2) insert a comma after me

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a speech about the pros and cons of building a fence around the neighborhood park, which reasons most effectively express the
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

<u>Effective:</u>

  • A fence will increase the safety of our children.
  • Building a fence will protect the park property and equipment.  
  • The cost can be offset of fundraisers such as bake sales and car washes.

<u>Ineffective:</u>

  • Many neighborhoods nearby have a fence.  
  • The fence will be several feet long.
  • The fence may be expensive to install.

Explanation:

It is important that the speaker includes strong arguments for building a park fence. In this light, he argues that the fence makes the children more safe, which is probably the greatest advantage of it. By stating the advantages of building a park fence, the speaker draws the attention of the audience. If he focused mainly on the disadvantages, the speech would not be effective.

4 0
3 years ago
The intended audience for adaption is most likely a
DochEvi [55]

A living, breathing audience makes speechmaking one of the most personal, exciting, and empowering forms of communication

• Speakers who fail to connect with their audiences will also fail to achieve their purpose; your purpose should not be fixed or inflexible; the more your learn about your audience, the more likely you will modify your purpose in small ways or even change it radically

6 0
3 years ago
Regional writers focused on?
Minchanka [31]
Larger-than-life conquests
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How might a mechanic genius help other people?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement would cause polarization?
    5·1 answer
  • Who causes the storm that nearly kills Odysseus while he is on the raft on his way to the island of the Phaeacians?
    14·1 answer
  • Which best describes the underlined words in this sentence?
    7·1 answer
  • Which word in the sentence is the participle?
    8·1 answer
  • Creating mind maps and advanced organizers is called
    15·1 answer
  • For a reader to blank <br>two or more things must consider how the things are different​
    7·1 answer
  • (17 points)Why did the United States provide Lend-Lease aid? (Choose 3)
    10·1 answer
  • ayuda u.uㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
    15·2 answers
  • Which evidence from the text is most relevant to Reagan's claim that Americans are destined to overcome obstacles? “Idle industr
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!