1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Harrizon [31]
3 years ago
13

Giving away brainilest.

English
1 answer:
vagabundo [1.1K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:Because your goal for this essay is to discuss how Shakespeare transformed the original source, you’ll want to focus, first, on what they both have in common (comparing similar attributes).  Then, you’ll want to focus on how elements of similarities were changed or how new things entirely were added or how things may have even been omitted (contrast).   This can be done in one of two ways—block or point by point.  

If you format the essay in block format, you’ll first discuss in a paragraph or two elements selected for discussion in “Pyramus and Thisbe.”  Then, after you finish discussing Ovid’s myth, you’ll discuss, also in a paragraph or two, the elements being compared/contrasted in Shakespeare’s work.  Be sure to discuss the same points in the same order in block method.  A compare/contrast essay in this method might resemble the following:

INTRO PARAGRAPH

BODY PARAGRAPH – Ovid

Attribute 1

Attribute 2

Attribute 3

BODY PARAGRAPH – Shakespeare

Attribute 1

Attribute 2

Attribute 3

CONCLUSION

Another method used when constructing a compare/contrast essay is called point by point.  In this format, you will discuss elements of both works within the same paragraph and do so point by point.  An essay constructed in this manner might resemble the following:

INTRODUCTION

PARAGRAPH

Attribute from Ovid

Same attribute from Shakespeare

PARAGRAPH

Attribute from Ovid

Same attribute from Shakespeare

PARAGRAPH

Attribute from Ovid

Same attribute from Shakespeare

CONCLUSION

In this type for format, be sure to always discuss the same work first.  Thus, Ovid should always be mentioned first, then you’ll follow that up with a discussion of Shakespeare because, after all, you are supposed to be discussing how Shakespeare changed things, and this would make the most sense.   Point by point would probably be the most efficient manner in which to highlight the transformations made by Shakespeare since it would keep both elements fresh within the mind/eye of the reader.

Compare and contrast means to analyze the similarities and differences between the myth and the play.

For example: Difference: The story of Pyramus and Thisbe is a tragedy, while the play is a comedy.

Similarity: The characters' basic situation is the same in both the play and the myth.

Then, put these ideas into paragraphs with a conclusion and introduction.

Talk about how Shakespeare transformed the sources by turning it from a tragedy to a comedy, and how he also stayed true to the source by keeping the characters and the main events they engage in the same.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
They find pearls on their coasts, and diamonds and carbuncles on their rocks; they do not look after them, but, if they find the
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]
The correct answer is the THIRD CHOICE

The central idea of the above passage is that the Utopians give valuables, such as diamonds and carbuncles to children, who treat them as toys. As such, the Utopians are <span>delighted with these valuables, and glory in them during their childhood but </span><span>lay them aside when they come to years.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Like painters and photographers of the same period many modernist writers experimented
azamat
I don't get the question, but if I had to guess what it'd have to be I'd say this statement is true. Many writers pushed boundaries, and experimented with what they were allowed to publish without restriction.
4 0
3 years ago
How do inferences help you better understand how an author wants us to view a character?
Tems11 [23]

Answer:

They help you understand the character because you guess things about the character, which makes you think harder, helping you better understand.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help With This Am Lit Question
nekit [7.7K]

I believe it is the last one, sorry if I am wrong.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following would be an example of a secondary source?
notsponge [240]

Answer:

the answer is a.encyclopedia

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Through observations many scientists have studied and come to understand nature
    5·1 answer
  • Which sentence contains an infinitive or infinitive phrase?
    14·1 answer
  • Which perspective would focus on how an individual interprets an event and applies it to their behavior?
    7·2 answers
  • Identify the sentence that varies from formal standard English.
    13·1 answer
  • True or False? Study-reading is a speed reading technique
    15·2 answers
  • Which detail best supports the tone in the passage?
    8·1 answer
  • Central idea is NOT generalized. It is NOT an observation about life.<br> True or False help fast
    6·2 answers
  • Two growing themes that are evident in the text. from Esperanza rising
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an appropriate use of an exclamation point? A. Where is the coffee that I asked for! B. Jake went down
    14·1 answer
  • What technique does the advertisement use to achieve its purpose? it encourages people to join the rest of society in buying a n
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!