Given what we know about the processes mentioned, we can confirm that a possible source for the extra salt in the stream is Nearby Fracking.
Fracking is a highly controversial process in which highly pressurized water is used for drilling. It is often used to mine natural gas and oil. The controversy lies within its high environmental cost.
The environmental cost factor lies in the use of <em><u>massive amounts of </u></em><em><u>water</u></em> and its further <em><u>contamination </u></em><em><u>of nearby </u></em><em><u>water sources</u></em> due to the chemicals released during this process.
This, coupled with the fact that the water source in question is stated to <em><u>not be connected to any form of </u></em><em><u>wetland</u></em> leads us to the conclusion that the most likely source of extra salt in the stream is nearby fracking.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/2157664?referrer=searchResults
I think bottom right. Not 100% sure though
You repeated the same question twice but the answer is hypothesis.
Answer:
It is possible to represent this process graphically by changing the color of the genomic fragment that has been translocated into a new genomic location. Thus, it is simple to observe that a translocation produces a deletion of the genomic fragment and its new localization in the chromosome
Answer:
DNA replication is faster and microscopic in size, smaller than eukaryotic cell.
Explanation:
The three domains of life are archaea, bacteria and eukarya. The two main biological division are prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The organisms that lacks the complete nucleus are included in prokaryotes.
The DNA replication is quite fast in prokaryotes as compared to eukaryotes because of small genome size, transcription is coupled with the translation and no post transcription modification is present in prokaryotes. The size of prokaryotes is quite small as compared with eukaryotes and shows the fast rate of diffusion.
Thus, the answer is option (a) and (c).
