Answer:
Persuasive
Explanation:
Because they author is trying to tell you or make you do something
I haven't a full answer for you, but here's how I'd suggest you start it:
There's clear evidence of your theme in the lines "When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept."
Reason being: Brutus only <em>told (verbally) </em>the people that Caesar was ambitious, giving <em>no </em>examples that are actual proof of how the great Julius Caesar acted. However, Mark Antony states right off the bat of what Caesar had done in his life-time. Antony decidedly debunks Brutus of any honourable traits as he continues with his Eulogy, as the more Antony says Brutus is "honourable," the more it is hypocritically placed. (<em>What I'm trying to say here is the more Antony says Brutus is honourable, it actually counter-intuitive, Antony is trying to take away any honour the horrible man had.)</em>
Answer:
show that the wartime goals of the U.S. Cavalry and the Kiowas were fundamentally different.
Explanation:
The language in this sentence suggests that the author wants to "show that the wartime goals of the U.S. Cavalry and the Kiowas were fundamentally different."
For the Kiowas, they fought as a result of their expertise as good warriors. They fought out of their character and nature to fight and not because of the material gains they will get as a means of survival. Whereas, the U.S. Cavalry were somewhat different as they kept pushing forward even at a time when there is no war.
Answer:
no answer but......maybe this help you..?
Explanation:
involving the agreement or cooperation of two political parties that usually oppose each other's policies.
"the reforms received considerable bipartisan approval"..