Answer:
I dont know what that says im sorry
Explanation:
:(
Not necessarily. it's considered <span>audacious, yes. not so nice to listen to. it had a purpose and was effective in fulfilling that purpose; it was definitely influential.
but nonetheless, from an aesthetic standpoint you could definitely argue that it's defective.</span>
Answer:
a practice in painting of depicting the natural appearances of objects by means of dabs or strokes of primary unmixed colors in order to simulate actual reflected light
Explanation:
proof-" 1 often capitalized : a theory or practice in painting especially among French painters of about 1870 of depicting the natural appearances of objects by means of dabs or strokes of primary unmixed colors in order to simulate actual reflected light. "
brainliest?
Look at the painting by Duchamp, entitled Nude Descending a
Staircase No.2 . The repetition and shifting diagonal lines creates a sense of mechanistic motion of a nude, with
superimposed facets, similar to motion pictures. It shows elements of both the
fragmentation and synthesis of the Cubists, and the movement and dynamism of
the Futurists.
