I would say A bill of rights because you can get a lot of information from a lot of sites the other options are pretty specific questions that you'd get one answer from if you researched them. hope this makes sense
Answer:
Moral relativism entails disregarding those values if it does not lead to a positive result.
Explanation:
Rachel disagrees with this and maintains that whatever the result, amoral is still right.
For example:- The assassin tells John where Paul is. John knows where Paul is and he suspects that Paul is being killed by the killer too. In this case, though telling the truth is a good thing and lying is unethical, it would be fitting if John were to say a lie and not reality.
I disagree with Rachel because it is the favourability of the verdict which gives its moral meaning. A person helps people, for example, a person is noble, a person helps society, and all such factors offer a moral meaning. If the moral does not have such principles or consequences and could contribute to the death of a person and aid a killer, it will no longer be a useful moral construct, and this is what moral relativism is a pleasing construct, as the administration states.
Answer:
Please helpppp meee! I'm rn in Ukraine, the invasion has begun early this morning! My house was bombed by a russian shell. I'm hurt!!! Give me some advice!! I don't have any medical substances nearby!!
Answer:
my answer to this question is to nit say anything
Where
in West Berlin and Alabama
when
1986
