In the 1600's Imperialism was based around colonization in the Americas and establishing trade in the east. During this period the Americas were being colonized intensely by the Europeans that were racing to gain as much land and prestige as possible. In the east, however, the main goal was to reach the Spice Islands (modern day Indonesia) and establish trade routes for the spices the Europeans desperately craved. Comparatively, in the 1900's Imperialism consisted of taking up land in places such as India, Africa, and Southeast Asia. This was done in a "mission to civilize" meaning it was less about economics and now a more political and racial element were used to justify European conquest.
Hope this helps M8
It is called winner -take all system
founded on one of the fundamental principle of democracy, this system requires statesmanship from the losing candidate, a sacrifice that is not guaranteed. Most elections are bitterly contested and it is always possible for the losing side to feel disenfranchised which may lead to outbreak of clashes, as the losing side supporters feel cheated.
A typical case study is in the Kenyan election where tensions are always very high, especially when opposition leader Raila Odinga loss an election, as he is always unwilling to concede.
Albert Einstein was born in Ulm, Germany and he taught at the University of Zurich
It made traveling and shipping easier for the people who owned industries
Question asked:List the pull factors that may have contributed to people's choice to immigrate to the united states
My answer is:The positive aspects of some countries serve to attract more immigrants than others. Below are three examples of pull factors that draw migrants to receiving countries such as America. Higher standards of living/Higher wages: Economic incentives provide both the biggest push and pull factors for potential migrants.
