In <em>Fahrenheit 451</em> the reason why the theme or concept Clarisse represents is so Interesting to Montag is that A. His society demands conformity from its citizens so she is a rare kind of person.
This is because she is described in the book as “seventeen and crazy,” and asks a lot of questions which is different from the conformist society where everyone is ordered to burn all books.
<h3>What is a Narration?</h3>
This refers to the storytelling that is done with the aid of a narrator to show the sequence of actions/
Hence, we can see that In <em>Fahrenheit 451</em> the reason why the theme or concept Clarisse represents is so Interesting to Montag is that A. His society demands conformity from its citizens so she is a rare kind of person.
This is because she is described in the book as “seventeen and crazy,” and asks a lot of questions which is different from the conformist society where everyone is ordered to burn all books.
Read more about Fahrenheit 451 here:
brainly.com/question/6834065
#SPJ1
The finishing point constructed by Twain is: when the old man is about to finish the story of Jim Smiley's jumping frog, another individual interrupts him. The narrator tries to leave the place, but the old man reaches it. The story ends with the old man who starts telling the narrator about a yellow cow with only one eye of Jim Smiley.
What I think the beautiful meaning behind this is...
Losing friends or followers can happen in life, friends come and go, and sometimes you don't need friends to be happy. But if you follow other people and believe their lies and stick to their opinion even though you might not agree with their opinion, you are under their control. Not only you are under their control, but you pretend to be something else by agreeing to these opinions and pretending you agree. Never always follow other people, you don't need to be the follower. Be the leader of your own tribe.
<em>Hope this helps & hope this is an important message! </em>
<em> ~Hocus Pocus</em>
There are multiple ways of comparing and contrasting structures that each have different implications and dangers.
1. The back-and-forth method, in which every other sentence compares and contrasts. ie:
P1- theme
-p1 Book A is blah, whereas Book B is blah.
P2- theme
-p2 Book A is blah.... you get the point,
The danger of this method is sounding too redundant, although it does a good job of focusing on the themes.
2. The separate, mixed theme method, in which an entire paragraph is dedicated to each subject, but the themes are thus mixed up within those paragraphs. This method is less redundant but runs the risk of losing clarity of theme.
3. The compare vs. contrast method. This one is fairly straightforward: A paragraph comparing, a paragraph contrasting, and one of synthesis at the end. The pros: It's playing it safe, and it'll work. The cons: It's boring.
Combinations of these 3 methods work as well, it all depends on your personal writing style and the subjects you're comparing.
Good luck
