1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alecsey [184]
3 years ago
10

Was American intervention in WWI ultimately beneficial or detrimental (both domestically and internationally) in terms of ending

the conflict and
establishing peace? Why or why not?
History
2 answers:
Sphinxa [80]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

America's intervention was beneficial in both ending the conflict and establishing peace.

Explanation:

while America had not entered the war when it began, they knew that the war would not be contained to Europe. they spent the first few years increasing the size and capabilities of their military. while they didn't make anywhere near as much initiative as Britain or France, they had more technology and power thanks to those years in preparation. America also helped end the conflict by joining the Allied powers to help strengthen the offence. while Britain and France fought on the Eastern Front. Russia had originally begun attacking the Central Powers of the Western front. Russia had pulled out of the war when Vladimir Lenin staged a revolt, overthrowing the Russian Czar and Establishing Russia as Communist state. after the revolution was a success. Lenin sighed an armistice agreement, ending Russia's engagement in the war. This left Britain and France fighting the entire might of Germany, Austria, the the entire Ottoman Empire. while it is possible that Britain and France could have defeated the Central powers without Americas intervention, It would have cost millions more lives.

In terms of Establishing Peace, America was the first to take initiative on that front. U.S President Woodrow Wilson established the League of Nations, a predicator to the modern United Nations. while the League did eventually fall apart, helping lead to the events of WW II, America was the only one who wanted to promote peace. France and Britain wanted to punish Germany by forcing them to pay twenty two billion dollars in war reparations. they also divided Germany and separated the German people. they also ignored they promises they made to Italy to give them land, and the debts to pay to japan. by ignoring Italy. Benito Mussolini rose to power, and allied with Hitler in Nazi Germany. japan had sent thousands of soldiers to fight in the war, but never received any reparations for their efforts. these actions had caused both Italy and japan to side with Germany in WWII, forming the Axis Powers. although Britain and Italy never intended to cause the deep hatred leading towards WWII, they never made any attempt to bring peace, while America did.

VMariaS [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It was good that America intervened, it's the main factor that ended World War 1. It was internationally and domestically good because if Germany were to win, it could cause future problems for the USA and all of Europe.

The detrimental was the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, which imposed harsh treaties on Germany which led to World War 2. That war affected everyone around the world.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is an example of the evils of totalitarian government in Nazi Germany?
xz_007 [3.2K]
Jews were forced to move from their homes to basically what we would call slums, but they were called "ghettos", which is where we get the slang term.
6 0
3 years ago
The State of the Union address and the Louisiana Purchase are both examples of how the meaning of the Constitution has been infl
krok68 [10]
C. Presidents would be the correct answer
7 0
3 years ago
Thaddeus Stevens, a congressional leader during Reconstruction,
Talja [164]

Answer:

your answer should be b have a nice day! correct me if im wrong

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A historian argues that the Roman leader Julius Caesar was assassinated because he was secretly plotting to overthrow the Roman
alexira [117]
So the claim says that Caesar wanted to overthrow the Roman Republic. This means that he must have been unhappy with the republic and must have thought it was not the best for Rome. In order to make a counter claim, we hat must find an evidence that he thought the opposite, so the correct answer is:
<span>D. Personal letters written by Julius Caesar indicate that he believed that Rome should always remain a republic. </span>


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hoe did hitler and the nazi party establish and maintain a titalitarian government
Hatshy [7]
Hitler and the Nazi party established and maintained a totalitarian government by using mostly force, power and sending fear into those who dared oppose them. Most of the population agreed with them but those who didn't were arrested, shot, or put in camps.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A nations warlike policy or practice is called_______ ?
    11·2 answers
  • When census numbers show changes in a state's total population, what is likely to be affected in the state?
    5·2 answers
  • How much did the average loaf of bread cost in 1912 in u.s.?
    12·2 answers
  • Select all the correct answers.
    11·1 answer
  • What natural and man-made objects can you identify in the bottom three panels
    11·2 answers
  • The Answer is C because the dinosaurs were declining by the end of the Cretaceous So the Meteor/Comet was the fatal blow for the
    12·1 answer
  • Use the following image to answer the question.
    13·2 answers
  • Imagine you are hosting a television show that features the world’s greatest religious leaders of all time. you need to introduc
    9·1 answer
  • !!!!!HELP DUE TODAY !!!!! <br> Life description of renaissance artist Tintoretto
    11·2 answers
  • What type of government is defined as rule by the people?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!