1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alecsey [184]
3 years ago
10

Was American intervention in WWI ultimately beneficial or detrimental (both domestically and internationally) in terms of ending

the conflict and
establishing peace? Why or why not?
History
2 answers:
Sphinxa [80]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

America's intervention was beneficial in both ending the conflict and establishing peace.

Explanation:

while America had not entered the war when it began, they knew that the war would not be contained to Europe. they spent the first few years increasing the size and capabilities of their military. while they didn't make anywhere near as much initiative as Britain or France, they had more technology and power thanks to those years in preparation. America also helped end the conflict by joining the Allied powers to help strengthen the offence. while Britain and France fought on the Eastern Front. Russia had originally begun attacking the Central Powers of the Western front. Russia had pulled out of the war when Vladimir Lenin staged a revolt, overthrowing the Russian Czar and Establishing Russia as Communist state. after the revolution was a success. Lenin sighed an armistice agreement, ending Russia's engagement in the war. This left Britain and France fighting the entire might of Germany, Austria, the the entire Ottoman Empire. while it is possible that Britain and France could have defeated the Central powers without Americas intervention, It would have cost millions more lives.

In terms of Establishing Peace, America was the first to take initiative on that front. U.S President Woodrow Wilson established the League of Nations, a predicator to the modern United Nations. while the League did eventually fall apart, helping lead to the events of WW II, America was the only one who wanted to promote peace. France and Britain wanted to punish Germany by forcing them to pay twenty two billion dollars in war reparations. they also divided Germany and separated the German people. they also ignored they promises they made to Italy to give them land, and the debts to pay to japan. by ignoring Italy. Benito Mussolini rose to power, and allied with Hitler in Nazi Germany. japan had sent thousands of soldiers to fight in the war, but never received any reparations for their efforts. these actions had caused both Italy and japan to side with Germany in WWII, forming the Axis Powers. although Britain and Italy never intended to cause the deep hatred leading towards WWII, they never made any attempt to bring peace, while America did.

VMariaS [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It was good that America intervened, it's the main factor that ended World War 1. It was internationally and domestically good because if Germany were to win, it could cause future problems for the USA and all of Europe.

The detrimental was the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, which imposed harsh treaties on Germany which led to World War 2. That war affected everyone around the world.

You might be interested in
As the United States expanded, U.S. policy toward American Indians focused
kotegsom [21]

Answer:

I do not really know but I think it is A

7 0
2 years ago
Why did mckinley win the election of 1896?
Masja [62]
Mckinley won the election because voters liked his approach and way of talking, saying that he will end the depressed economy. 
3 0
3 years ago
1. Where did the ideas for changes to the Constitution come from? What
kari74 [83]

Answer:

Explanation:

When the Constitution was being written, the men writing the document realized it might have to be altered in the future.  Since the document was written in a general format, the delegates realized that as time changed, it might be necessary to change the Constitution.  However, the delegates believed that it should be more difficult to change the Constitution than to change a law.  Thus, they required two-thirds of both houses of Congress and three-fourths of the state governments to agree to change it.

The ideas for making specific changes came from many places. One of the places where people looked for change was in the English

6 0
3 years ago
Drag the slide to the desired place.
Pavel [41]

Answer:

What?

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
What what the purpose of the second treaty of paris
VikaD [51]
Second treaty of Paris negotiated between the United States and Great Britain, ended the revolutionary war and recognized American independence.

Hope This Sufficient !!
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the last battle associated with the war of 1812
    10·1 answer
  • Agricultural Revolution had what results?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the english gain the colony and change the name to New York
    12·1 answer
  • China demonstrated its willingness to open talks with the United States by
    9·2 answers
  • A potential cost for a government leader using a cost-benefit analysis is
    7·1 answer
  • What was unusual about the battle of new orleans?
    8·1 answer
  • Give two evidences to prove the advancement in science and medicine, during the Ayyubid dynasty
    8·1 answer
  • Changes in voting rights helped Andrew Jackson become president because
    14·1 answer
  • Explain whether the decision of slave states to secede helped to preserve slavery, or did secession of the South (ironically) ac
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following events would most likely cause an increase in Indian nationalism? Gandhi holds a rally encouraging Indian
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!