What does this mean. I’m confused
<h2>Famous quote</h2>
The quote given <em>"Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened" </em>does not have a clear author. However, most people attribute it to:
- Dr. Seuss and others say that its author is anonymous.
<h3>Meaning:</h3>
- The quote is about not being sad because something that you enjoyed is over and be happy because it happened and you experienced it although it is over.
<h3>Dr. Seuss</h3>
Dr. Seuss was a very famous writer and cartoonist from the United States who lived from 1904 to 1991. He is the author of books for children that then were made into famous movies. For example, The Grinch.
Check more questions related to Dr. Seuss here brainly.com/question/1296125?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
John Richard ("Packed" or "J.R.") Simplot (/ˈsɪmplɒt/; January 4, 1909 – May 25, 2008) was an American entrepreneur and businessman best known as the founder of the J. R. Simplot Company, a Soda Springs, Idaho based agricultural supplier specializing in potato products.
Answer:
I think it would be really easy to cheat cause you can pull it out under your desk and go to brainly. I think school students should be able to use mobile phones in PE and Lunch, or any other time were you don't actually learn.
If you get caught they shouldn't take the phone though, just tell the parents cause that's actually just stealing.
In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:
"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."
Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.
On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.
