Answer: “The fool walked up and demanded to be heard”
Reasoning: The other options would be deemed as personal opinions, not a defined action. The fool walking would be a fact
Answer: The correct answer is the first one (A) second one (B) fifth one (E) and sixth one (F)
Explanation: I got it right on Edgenuity.
There are four basic types of legislation: bills; joint resolutions; concurrent resolutions; and simple resolutions.
Proponents of an <u>integrative mind design</u> would argue that your awareness of the context affected your interpretation of the ambiguous word.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Integrative thinking is the ability of thinking and producing a creative solution out of two opposing ideas. This kind of scenario occurs when the person is under tension.
The created solution should be common to both the situation and superior to both.
The new idea is created to face the situation in tension. This is known as integrative thinking.
In the above scenario, the sister yelled at her sister on seeing the barking dogs surrounding her. It used the term be_ le instead of beagle. This is was due to tension.
I believe the correct answer is the first option. In regents of the university of california v. bakke (1978), the supreme court determined that racial quotas in university were unconstitutional. It was a landmark decision that was made by the Supreme Court. It did not allowed race to be one of the factors in admission to colleges.
