1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anit [1.1K]
3 years ago
15

What was Germany's reaction to the Treaty of Paris (explain two reactions that led to WWII)

History
1 answer:
Usimov [2.4K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Reactions to the Treaty in Germany were very negative. There were protests in the German Reichstag Parliament and out on the streets. It is not hard to see why Germans were outraged. Germany lost 10% of its land, all its overseas colonies, 12.5% of its population, 16% of its coal and 48% of its iron industry.

Explanation:

:)

You might be interested in
What other groups besides the ku klux klan worked to reduce support for republicans in the south?
faltersainse [42]
The White League and the Knights of the White Camellia also <span>worked to reduce support for Republicans in the south.

</span>The Knights of the White Camelia was an American political terrorist organization that operated in the southern United States in the 19th century, similar to and associated with the Ku Klux Klan, supporting white<span> supremacy and opposing freedmen's rights. 
</span>The White League<span>, also known as the </span>White<span> Man's </span>League<span>, </span>was an American white<span> paramilitary organization started in 1874 to kick Republicans out of office and intimidate freedmen from voting and politically organizing.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The conquistadors was the reason México became a major part of Spanish colonial empire .
malfutka [58]
I think it might be true i’m not sure
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In October of 1945, the Reynolds pen company had $26,000. How much was the company earning every month soon after the ball-point
Lelu [443]

Answer:

Hope this help pls inform me if more info is needed!

Explanation:

summer of 1944: a Hungarian inventor living in Argentina had created something sensational. Practical fountain pens with internal ink cartridges had been in use for decades, but Laszlo Biro devised a new version that used a ball bearing instead of a nib—in other words, the modern ballpoint pen. It used instant-drying ink that rolled smoothly onto the page, and could write for six months—even at high altitudes—without being refilled.

Easier, more reliable pens were a huge draw for consumers. For pen manufacturers and distributors, however, the real news was that Biro had filed a patent, which meant that the company that bought the rights ought to be able to corner the ballpoint market. That was thought to be Eversharp, which TIME identified as “the biggest pen and pencilmaker in the world,” who acquired the North and Central American rights to the new pen for a half million dollars.

Except for one thing. Reynolds International Pen Co. decided to manufacture their own version, and get it out to stores first. Eversharp’s legal attempts to stop them failed, and 70 years ago, on Oct. 29, 1945, the Reynolds pen became the first-ever modern ballpoint pen sold in the U.S.. At the New York City store that stocked it, demand was high, as TIME reported:

In Manhattan’s Gimbel Bros., Inc., thousands of people all but trampled one another last week to spend $12.50 each for a new fountain pen. The pen was made by Chicago’s Reynolds International Pen Co. In full-page ads, Gimbel’s modestly hailed it as the “fantastic, atomic era, miraculous pen.” It had a tiny ball bearing instead of a point, was guaranteed to need refilling only once every two years, would write under water (handy for mermaids), on paper, cloth, plastic or blotters.

Gimbel’s had ordered 50,000 pens to stock and sold 30,000 of them in that first week.

4 0
4 years ago
What were two reasons that Europeans ventured into Africa?
oksian1 [2.3K]
To mine raw materials and enslave people for cheap labor.
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a Supreme Court judge has personal religious objections to military service, but rules in favor of the draft because it is a
astra-53 [7]
If a Supreme Court judge has personal religious objections to military service, but rules in favor of the draft because it is a federal law, that judge is <span>practicing "judicial restraint," since he or she is not letting her personal feeling get in the way of upholding the law. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What do these headlines demonstrate about the process of ratifying the Constitution?
    5·2 answers
  • In response to criticisms leveled against catholic practices, the church met from 1545-1564 at the
    15·1 answer
  • What was NOT part of the marshall plan?
    9·1 answer
  • How did Descartes’s approach to science differ from Bacon’s?
    11·1 answer
  • Place the following events in chronological order.
    10·2 answers
  • The Constitutional principle of checks and balances is exemplified by
    12·1 answer
  • ¿Consideramos que el Lobo es un personaje estereotipo? Explicamos.​
    9·1 answer
  • What are the meanings of these?<br><br> Sawm<br> Salat<br> Hajj<br> Zakat<br> Jihad<br> Shahada
    8·1 answer
  • Cuando empezo la mineria en venezuela en la epoca colonial
    6·1 answer
  • 3)
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!