A. If the two premises fit the pattern of Law of Detachment, Law of Contrapositive, or Law of Syllogism, determine the conclusio
n that logically follows and which law.
When I ski, I fall down.
I didn’t fall down.
I didn't go skiing.
I went skiing.
If I go skiing I will fall down.
No valid conclusion.
Question 2
b. What Law of Logic led you to your conclusion in part a?
Law of Syllogism
Law of Contrapositive
No law, it's not a valid conclusion
Law of Detachment
2 answers:
Answer:
law of detachment
Step-by-step explanation:
You might be interested in
Answer:
x+2y=-7
Step-by-step explanation:
2y + x =-7
x+2y=-7
Answer:
I am pretty sure the answer would be B
Step-by-step explanation:
Im sorry if it is wrong
Answer:
(2)
The increased amount is 9
The answer is:
It’s equivalent to 30+5y
Brand X cost: $4.50
Brand Y cost: $3.50
Christopher spends total: $49.50
Equation: 4.50x + 3.50y = 49.50
Idk how to solve the equation but this should be the correct equation