<span>In his book Walden, a reflection on the act of living as simply as possible, Thoreau spoke at length on the impact of technology on our daily lives and humanity as a whole. He believed that technology was leading to a degradation of our relations with one another and with the natural world. He cited the construction of a telegraph line from Maine to Texas, saying,"We are in great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph line from Maine to Texas; but Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing important to communicate." We can see them same in our modern day quest for the "next big thing"; snapping up the latest iPhone for hundreds of dollars, posting ever more on social media, with many having nothing important to contribute to a wider world despite access to that world at an unprecedented level. As a society, we have at our fingertips the lessons and work of all the world's great thinkers and scholars, and yet a great number of people use the potential at hand to watch funny cat videos. I believe that this is a sign of the degradation that Thoreau spoke of made manifest.</span>
The use of the pronoun "we" in the final sentence of the excerpt; unites Kennedy with the everyday Americans to whom he is speaking.
<h3>Plural Pronouns</h3>
From the excerpt, it follows that the speech was addressed to the citizens which indicates All Americans.
The last sentence reads thus; In the last 24 hours, we had their answer.
The use of the first person plural pronoun, we indicates that Kennedy was referring to himself and the everyday Americans as used in the context.
Read more on Plural pronouns;
brainly.com/question/928913
Answer:
C.) through the explanation that Toby can sense when Parker will have a seizure
Explanation:
The author's viewpoint that Toby has improved Parker's life is conveyed in the Newsela article through the explanation that Toby, the dog can sense when Parker will have a seizure.
Toby has improved Parker's life by being a faithful companion and intervening to help manage his health challenges by knowing and alerting people nearby before Parker has a seizure.
Answer: B
Explanation: i answered it and got it right
Answer:
the argument presented by the lawyer was clear and vivid that he had a clear chance of winning the trial.
Explanation: