Answer:
Carbon
Explanation:
More smoke means more carbon in the air. The defects in the car exhaust system results more smoke than the level permitted. The car manufacturing company is exceeding its carbon emissions. This company will have high carbon emission in the market and could effect the environment. This situation might require the regulatory authority to be involved and take some actions.
Answer:
A. Partnership
Explanation:
Based on the description of this scenario it can be said that the best option for Mary would be a Partnership. This means that she will share ownership and profit with those involved but at the same time will also share the liabilities. This will make sure that the other tattoo artists will do their utmost best since they will have to deal with the consequences as well if they do not. Which in term protects Mary.
Answer:
In simple words, Retired, incapacity, as well as survivor payments are all part of the Social Security program. In its nature, it is very much like a defined benefit pension plan.
Most employees contribute Social Security levies on their income to apply for many of these claims; claimants' advantages are dependent on the wages earner's payments. Aside from that, benefits like Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are dependent on use.
There are no federal issues that give the U.S. Supreme Court jurisdiction over this lawsuit filed by Paul Stone against his employer for assault and battery by female employees.
- Ordinarily, the U.S. Supreme Court does not entertain such lawsuits because they do not involve constitutional matters unless it chooses to.
- Moreover, the state's supreme court has already upheld the dismissal of the case. Paul Stone should rest the case. Going too far results in loss of time and money.
- Assault and battery involve the use of force to hurt a person. This is not the case here.
Thus, the U.S. Supreme Court may not find any constitutional issues in Paul Stone's case.
Read more about assault and battery at brainly.com/question/23397179
Answer:
FALSE
The statment is false, the gain is 15,000
Explanation:
When there is commercial substance the exchange of long-term assets will recognize a gain or a loss on exchange.
When there isn't the diference will be adjusted using the value of the new asset.
In this case <u>we have commercial substance,</u> so the buyer will report a gain on exchange for 15,000 which is the allowance made by the seller.
The value has 15,000 trade-in allowance. Which means it value is for 25,000
So the diference between the current fixed asset and the new one is 15,000
25,000 - 10,000 = 15,000
The statment is false, the gain is 15,000